[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] - [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: AO-40 V-Rx
- Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Re: AO-40 V-Rx
- From: "Stacey E. Mills" <w4sm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 11:54:52 -0400
>Wayne replies:
>
>I misinterpreted B'Dale Garbee's message about RUDAK a couple days ago.
>Re-reading it, I see that he said RUDAK is deaf on ALL RECEIVERS, not just
>the 2m receiver.
>
>Wayne Estes W9AE
>Mundelein, IL, USA
OK, given the number of real problems we have had to overcome, I just
didn't want a non-existent one added to the list.
As B'dale noted, this is a RUDAK issue, not a V-Rx problem. BTW, deafness
to me is a binary, all or none phenomenon, like blindness, electrocution,
drowning, pregnancy, etc..... I'd prefer to say that RUDAK is "hard of
hearing" or, perhaps, "acoustically challenged." :-) It can be accessed
but the power levels required are considerably higher than
anticipated. The reasons for this are not clear, but do not reside with
the receivers. There are a number of options to pursue here, primarily
with regard to the DSP modems, as it is possible that these may be
programmed for 1200 baud PSK or other mode requiring lower S/N.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Stacey E. Mills, W4SM WWW: http://www.cstone.net/~w4sm/ham1.html
Charlottesville, VA PGP key: http://www.cstone.net/~w4sm/key
________________________________________________________________________
----
Via the amsat-bb mailing list at AMSAT.ORG courtesy of AMSAT-NA.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amsat-bb" to Majordomo@amsat.org
AMSAT Home