[amsat-bb] Re: Government control has exceeded constitutional limitations.

[Jim Jerzycke]

Or it makes you wonder what else they have that uses
this band that they're not telling us about.....
Jim  KQ6EA

--- John Magliacane <kd2bd at yahoo.com> wrote:

> --- Ernest Erickson <aec9823 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > With all our money at the government's disposal,
> you
> > would think that their brilliant minds should be
> able
> > to think their way through this so-called
> interference
> > and find a sutiable solution to a simple problem,
> such
> > as side lobe rejection, additional band pass
> filtering
> > or whatever is required to minimize or eliminate
> this
> > 'interference' althogether.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> This discussion came up recently on the "Tech Net",
> hosted by K2RIW on
> Long Island, an audio archive of which can be found
> at: http://amateurradio.tv/
> 
> Specifically, 40 minutes into the following clip,
> the PAVE PAWS discussion
> can be found:
> 
>
http://amateurradio.tv/TechNet/Library/2007tech/070401tech/070401tech-001.mp3
> 
> (It's a 6.5 MB file)
> 
> The discussion points out that this RADAR system has
> been around for quite a
> number of years and is an extremely agile system, so
> it should be immune to
> simple forms of interference caused by regular
> Amateur Radio communications.
> 
> If PAVE PAWS is *THAT* easily interfered with, and
> that fact is not a secret,
> what does that say about its usefulness?
> 
> 
> 73, de John, KD2BD
> 
> 
> Visit John on the Web at:
> 
> 	http://kd2bd.ham.org/
> .
> .
> .
> .
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are
> those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
> amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>