[amsat-bb] Re: The need for telemetry data -or what happened toFO-29-

Roger Kolakowski rogerkola at aol.com
Tue May 1 15:49:28 PDT 2007


Maybe all satellites who don't want to monitor their own telemetry or
construct an earth station system to do so should be launched with a
transmitter that feeds into the APRS system?

I know this becomes more complicated but the rewards might outweigh (no pun
intended) the negatives. As Bob pointed out, a system is in place, maybe
satellites that produce life telemetry could standardize and plug into the
system that already exists?

Roger
WA1KAT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Ronan" <jronan at irishsystems.com>
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 7:02 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: The need for telemetry data -or what happened
toFO-29-


>
> On 1 May 2007, at 22:36, SV1BSX wrote:
>
> >  Gentlemans,
> >
> >  all these about TLM-capturing are good & rights,
> > and yes, it's a reality for the birds like PACSAT,
> > ANDE etc. as they already have AX.25.
> >
> >  But, at my opinion, the Analogue-Birds is other
> > story. They have a different category of users.
> >  They are interesting mainly for QSOs, firstly.
> > So, it's definitely a "bore job" for this kind of
> > peoples to capture the TLM, when at the same time they
> > can do "exciting" QSOs through the Satellite.
> >
> >
> What about when the operator is asleep or in work?
>
> Regards
> de John
> EI7IG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>



More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list