[amsat-bb] Feed Line Loss @ Freq vs. Price
Steve Raas
sraas at optonline.net
Wed May 9 17:51:39 PDT 2007
To any one interested , I just did some comparisons to 3 different cables @
146, 435 & 1268.100 Mhz for any one that might want the info.
Andrews LDF4-50A ½ Hardline Loss
@ 1268.100 Mhz 40 = 1.01 DB Loss
@ 435.100 Mhz 40 = 0.568 DB Loss
@ 146.000 Mhz 40 = 0.3212 DB Loss
LMR-600/CNT-600
@ 1268.100 Mhz 40 = 1.16 DB Loss
@ 435.000 Mhz 40 = 0.68 DB Loss
@ 146.000 Mhz 40 = 0.40 DB Loss
LMR-400/CNT-400
@ 1268.000 Mhz 40 = 1.8 Db Loss
@ 435.100 Mhz 40 = 1.08 Db Loss
@ 146.000 Mhz 40 = 0.60 Db Loss
Now for the interesting info
..
COST
40 Andrews LDF4-50A (Hardline)Terminated with dual N Male connectors -
$98.34 + Shipping
40 LMR-600/CNT-600 Terminated with the same N male $111.30 + Shipping
40 LMR-400/CNT-600 Terminated with the same N male - $ 49.78 + Shipping
Note the Shipping charges to my location were the same regardless of cable
type @ 13.82 pr/run
I posted this info for an interesting comparison.. the best cable (of the
three) is cheaper than the 2nd lowest loss cable!!! The reason I took the
freq so low was for those whom may want to run a tx converter on 146 or 435
for a 1268 uplink.
For me, none of theses cables @ 40 provide low enough loss to run 1268Mhz
from in the shack.. trying to keep the loss below 1.0 db. Just at a glance
you could gain .0788 DB running a 146 I.F. to a TX converter or .112 db
running a 435 Mhz I.F. to a tx converter with the Hardline. A total loss of
between 1.01 dB 1.18 dB by running 1268Mhz In shack, depending on the
cable. However a .32 db feed loss on 1268 (running a rx/tx converter on
146Mhz) is OUTSTANDING if you run the ½ hardline.
Also keep in mind that as long as your I.F. dosent change, neither will
your loss!
The cost difference is $ 12.96 . ( how ironic ) Between the Hardline &
LMR/CNT-600
A lot of people use the LMR-400/CNT-400 which is less expensive yes, but
with ½ dB more loss on 146 , 1 dB more loss on 432 , & a whopping 2 dB more
loss on 1268 vs. the LMR-600/CNT-600 cable, slightly more vs. the Hardline
it dosent seem logical to run it for an in shack, microwave application. (
see below actuall watt loss )
Now thats the raw dB #s
lets break this down to good ole fashon WATTS!
Now, for uplink @ 1268.100Mhz loosing 5.244 watts dosent seem like much,
however.. try looking for an amp for $ 48.56 Cents, the difference could
be a SSB uplink quality ( if your running 1268Mhz in shack )
40 of Andrews LDF4-50A with 15 watts in @ 1268.100 = 11.88 Watts at the
other end / 3.12 Watts lost
40 of LMR-600/CNT-600 with 15 watts in @ 1268.100 = 11.355 Watts at the
other end / 3.645 Watts lost
40 of LMR-400/CNT-400 with 15 watts in @ 1268.100 = 9.756 Watts at the
other end / 5.244 Watts lost or OVER 1/3rd of your R.F.
40 of Andrews LDF4-50A with 15 watts in @ 435 = 13.156 Watts at the other
end / 1.84 Watts lost
40 of LMR-600/CNT-600 with 15 watts in @ 435 = 12.867 Watts at the other
end / 2.133 Watts lost
40 of LMR-400/CNT-400 with 15 watts in @ 435 = 11.762 Watts at the other
end / 3.238 Watts lost
40 of Andrews LDF4-50A with 15 watts in @ 146 = 13.928 Watts at the other
end / 1.072 Watts lost
40 of LMR-600/CNT-600 with 15 watts in @ 146 = 13.741 Watts at the other
end / 1.259 Watts lost
40 of LMR-400/CNT-400 with 15 watts in @ 146 = 13.068 Watts at the other
end / 1.932 Watts lost
All said and done, this should provide at least 3 points:
#1 Mast mounted TX / RX converters excellent way to save valuable db !
#2 The expensive stuff may not be the best stuff !
#3 Good cable may save you running a Pair of antennas or an amplifier !
Cable Type, cable loss , power & freq calculator @ -
http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm
The prices here are from a well known custom cable company ( not listed
because im not affiliated with them, nor do I want to advertise for them )
Hope this was informative !
-Steve Raas
N2JDQ
FN20vg
http://n2jdq2007.tripod.com/
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list