[amsat-bb] Re: New SpaceX launch time 00:00UTC

[Joe]

Seems weird,

In the audio someone linked to the second stage seperation seemed to go 
just fine and second stage igntioon also.

if there was a proble with the seperation you would think they would 
know immediately when second tried to light up.

Joe WB9SBD

Bill Ress wrote:

>Spaceflight Now has a running news commentary at....
>
>http://www.spaceflightnow.com/falcon/003/status.html
>
>Tough break for SpaceX.
>
>Sorry for my earlier "overly optimistic" video link to launch #2.
>
>Regards...Bill - N6GHz
>
>Dave hartzell wrote:
>  
>
>>Jim,
>>
>>While at the time I write this there has been no official word from
>>SpaceX, the anomaly just goes to show how difficult the launch
>>business is (and why it is so expensive).
>>
>>There is certainly a learning curve that these companies must
>>experience.  Without anomalies and failures at the beginning, bugs
>>don't get worked out of the systems and may linger, only to surface
>>when least expected.
>>
>>SpaceX represents an amazing opportunity for low-cost access to space!
>> Hopefully AMSAT will have a spacecraft to launch in the near future!
>>
>>73,
>>Dave
>>AF6KD
>>
>>On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea at pacbell.net> wrote:
>>  
>>    
>>
>>>OOOPS! Another "anomaly" for Mr. Musk and crew.
>>>Wonder what they're explanation will be *this* time?
>>>Jim  KQ6EA
>>>
>>>    
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>>  
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>  
>