[amsat-bb] Re: re best transceiver for sats
ka3hsw@att.net
ka3hsw at att.net
Fri Jul 4 08:03:49 PDT 2008
Having done satellites with separate transceivers (IC-275 and IC-475H);
separate transmitter, receiver, and transverters (Drake B-line twins with
TC-2/SC-2/CC-1); and a single all-mode multi-band transceiver (910H), I
wouldn't trade the 910 for anything! Especially when combined with SatPC32
for full doppler and rotor control... I first used one for Field Day in
2001 (borrowed from the local ham store), and immediately sold my B-line
Drakes, a Yaesu FT-8100R, and a few other things to fund the purchase of my
own!
73,
George, KA3HSW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angus" <angus at young5769.freeserve.co.uk>
To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 6:41 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] re best transceiver for sats
> Hi all,
> just wondering what you think is the best transceiver or transceivers for
> the satellites. By this I mean to be able to TX and RX at the same time
> (covering from 144mhz, 70cm and 23cm), was thinking possibly something
> like the ICOM IC910 (with 23cm board added) so that USB downlink and LSB
> uplink can be done (can the TS2000 do this also). Or is it better to have
> 2 seperate radios altogether, and use one for the uplink and one for the
> downlink?
> Any thoughts or what do you think is the ultimate set up, doing quite well
> here with very simple FT817 and old FT480R but using transverter for
> 23cms.
> regards
> Gus M0IKB
>
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list