[amsat-bb] Re: WB9L cross-satellite again

Auke de Jong, VE6PWN sparkycivic at shaw.ca
Sat Oct 18 21:30:11 PDT 2008


isn't cross-satellite operation involving signals travelling BETWEEN 
satellites before being heard by the other station?  AO-16 and AO-51 have 
their uplinks in the SAME BAND, and downlinks also in the SAME BAND so 
wouldn't that make it impossible to for either satellite to react to the 
other??
The way I read this... you are hearing unintentional uplinks to the 
satellite you're listening on, just because the second sat has an identical 
uplink, and overlapping footprint.  Please correct me if I'm interpreting 
this wrongly.


73
Auke
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <n3tl at bellsouth.net>
To: <AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:15 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] WB9L cross-satellite again


> Hey folks,
>
> Mike, WB9L, and I worked cross-satellite at 22:50 UTC. Mike was on AO-51 
> to the northeast, while I was working AO-16 to the southwest. I heard some 
> other stations that I know were working AO-51, but didn't get any other 
> contacts. Both satellites were low elevation to me here in north Georgia.
>
> 73,
>
> Tim - N3TL
> AMSAT Member No. 36820
> Athens, Ga. - EM84ha
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/1728 - Release Date: 10/16/2008 
7:38 AM



More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list