[amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?

[Gary "Joe" Mayfield]

Sebastian makes a great point, and the other side of the coin is LOTW
contains all the information needed for Satellite VUCC.  One would hope it
will get added to the list soon.

73,
Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Sebastian
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 12:40 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LOTW &/or eQSL ?

If you are chasing  VUCC - LoTW currently is not configured for VUCC.

I still upload those logs however, in hope that if they ever do  
configure it for VUCC, my data is there.

73 de W4AS
Sebastian

On Dec 31, 2008, at 12:51 AM, John W Lee wrote:

>
> Alan,
> There is no reason you can't upload to both E-QSL and LOTW.
>
> I send in my logs monthly to both.   E-QSL's really don't count for  
> any
> of the major awards.
>
> LOTW confirmations count for DXCC and WAS.
>
> 73,
> John K6YK
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:56:30 -0600 (CST) "Alan Sieg WB5RMG"
> <wb5rmg at somenet.net> writes:
>> I started using eQSL a year or so back, and have only recently seen
>> enough
>> action in my log to warrant uploading new contacts. I've been trying
>> to
>> go back thru old logs, and get caught up on returning some QSLs...
>>
>> Seems what I'm hearing is that some do eQSL, some LOTW, others only
>> paper...
>> Reckon is there any harm in also doing LOTW ?     How many do both
>> ?
>> I'm sure that there are some that don't do either - no great loss I
>> guess.
>>   /;^)
>> -- 
>>  <- Licensed in 1976, WB5RMG = Alan Sieg * AMSAT#20554 ->
>>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb