[amsat-bb] Re: LF Satellite ideas?

Alan P. Biddle APBIDDLE at UNITED.NET
Sun Dec 12 04:38:06 PST 2010


Running a long conductor at high speeds through even a week magnetic field
produces some impressive voltages.  It has been proposed as a way to convert
kinetic energy to electrical power, and run in reverse to provide a method
to reboost spacecraft.  Lots of theoretical and experimental studies on that
aspect.

Alan
WA4SCA
 

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Jeff Yanko
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 5:26 AM
To: Bob Bruninga ; amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LF Satellite ideas?

Hi all,

A 1100 meter long antenna attached to a satellite moving through a very thin

atmosphere would be interesting.  My concern would be the static build up of

energy on the antenna leading back to the satellite.  I would think it this 
would fry any circuitry in the satellite.  If I recall correctly didn't one 
of the shuttle mission have a problem of static build up on along tether and

had to give up on the experiment?


73,

Jeff  WB3JFS







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Bruninga " <bruninga at usna.edu>
To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 11:13 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] LF Satellite ideas?


> Is 137 KHz possible from space?
>
> Our next Cubesat will have a 1100 meter long antenna (think tether 
> satellite).  It will ultimatelly be an electrodynamic tether but the first

> one will have NO ACTIVE ELECTRONICS connected to the tether.
>
> So I have asked them to make it 1100m long instead of a generic 1km tether

> to try to make it resonant in an amateur band.  THe path loss at 137 KHz 
> is 60 dB LESS than it is at 2 meters, so it shouldn't take much to 
> communicate with an 1100m long antenna.
>
> I'm sorry I didnt think of this sooner, but I need a real SCIENCE 
> justification for this.  Maybe LF that low will never punch through the 
> ionosphere, or maybe it will be completely absorbed.  Can give good 
> science on this idea?
>
> Bob, WB4APR
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> 


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list