[amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100

[Greg D.]

I was just thinking the same thing!  (FT-736R w/ 1.2 ghz, and FT-767GX w/ 6m, 2m, and 70cm modules, in my case...)

Greg  KO6TH


> From: ve4yz at hotmail.com
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:17:27 -0500
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
> 
> My 15 year old FT736R with the 1.2 module and my FT847 keep looking better -
> like a fine wine aging.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
> Behalf Of Mik Forsythe
> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:22 PM
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Icom 9100
> 
> Just left Dayton a few hours ago.  Icom said that it is basically a 7600 and
> a 910.  It is bigger than the 910.  It was in a display case so I can't tell
> you what the feel was like of the weight.  Price is in the $4,000.00 range
> so that will kill a lot of the satellite market if you ask me.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2