[amsat-bb] Re: Fw: Stop flaming please

[MSG Craig R Gagner]

Well if you look at the message it was not sent to the list, it was 
forwarded by the recipient. Not knowing if there were any additional 
private e-mails between the two is something to consider.

This seems to be a really hot topic, its not the end of the world. 
Donate to the FOX-1 and FOX-2 project and lets get the new birds in the 
air...

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, B.P. wrote:

> I can only hope that the moderator of this group will immediately 
> terminate Kevin
> KF7MYK from this group.  That sort of language is totally uncalled for 
> in this group.
> You Kevin are a disgrace to the rest of us Americans and Ham operators 
> around the world.  
> Bruce 
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Bruce <kk5do at amsat.org>
> To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb at amsat.org> Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 
> 3:45 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Fw:  Stop flaming please
>  ones intelligence, temperment and social graces are only outshined by 
> their chioice of words.
> 73...bruce
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: Kevin Deane <summit496 at live.com>
> To: andythomasmail at yahoo.co.uk Sent: Saturday, 3 December 2011, 19:15
> Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Stop flaming please
>
>
> shut the fuck up dumbass, there will be nobody there on FM
>
> Kevin
> KF7MYK
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:35:10 +0000
>> From: andythomasmail at yahoo.co.uk
>> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Stop flaming please
>>
>> I don't see why someone can't make a suggestion about a qrp 
>> experiment without being flamed about being incompetent, inadequate,  
>> financially poor or in some other way a lesser member of the -bb. You 
>> guys ought to learn a little more tolerance.
>>   Fact #1 is, ao-51 is dead and we don't have anything else of that 
>> quality for all of those operators who like doing field operations 
>> with an arrow. SO-50 is at best unpredictable and AO27 is not always 
>> on, depends on its ssp. Fact #2 is that anyone who is an alligator 
>> could have taken over vo-52 and didn't, thankfully. Fact #3 is that 
>> nobody would without seeking permission.
>>   So please cut back from the snide clever-clever remarks about 
>> having too small a piece of kit, hi. I don't feel bad about raising 
>> the idea.
>>   73 de andy g0sfj
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the 
>> author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the 
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the 
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the 
> author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite 
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb