[amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol

[John Neeley]

Does anyone even read that mag??  We need old Wayne Green and 73 magazine back 
again, I'd just about bet that would work......between 73 and HamRadio mags, 
they were the BEST ham rags out......too bad they got eaten up.  


John W6ZKH






________________________________
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea at verizon.net>
To: "rnutter at networkref.com" <rnutter at networkref.com>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 1:11:35 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Sat protocol

Maybe try CQ-VHF?
Jim  KQ6EA

On 01/10/2011 09:00 PM, rnutter at networkref.com wrote:
> I have talked directly to the editor in chief of QST. I got a "not interested" 
>response
>
> Ron
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:40 PM, wa4hfn at comcast.net wrote:
>
>  
>>
>>
>> Maybe now would be a good time for someone to write an artical for QST on how 
>>to work the birds! 
>>
>>
>> Perhaps send an email to the new satellite ops explaining to them proper way  ( 
>>BE A MENTOR ) 
>>
>>
>> Something needs to be done thats for sure 
>>
>> WA4HFN  Damon em55
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>    
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>  

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb