[amsat-bb] Re: Cables for small satellites
    Graham Shirville 
    g.shirville at btinternet.com
       
    Thu May  5 04:53:25 PDT 2011
    
    
  
Hi All,
Many thanks to the kind experts who kindly sent us information in repect to 
this enquiry a couple of weeks ago.
For FUNcube we have determined that the best coax for our purposes is RG178. 
The following reasons:
we are only concerned with VHF and UHF signals
flight heritage
small diameter
small minimum bend radius
suitability for a variety of connectors - we are using  MCX,  MMCX and SSMCX 
connectors on different boards (for good reasons of course)
Lessons learnt and advice received included:
RG178 should not be used outside a spacecraft where it might be exposed to 
UV
The cables will need retaining in some way to resist viabration during 
launch - glue to board or "tie" to structure.
The connectors will also need to be glued together before flight
It may be peferable/more reliable to solder cables directly to boards for 
flight models.
All connectors are designed for a limited number of insertions. Therefore 
"saver" cable/connector assemblies should be used during most of the 
testing/verification programme.
There is a range of extra flexible semi-rigid cables available. (Thats 
sounds confused)
Like all COTS items used in space, the minimum bend radius rule of thumb - 6 
times the outer diameter - should be derated if possible.
again thanks an apologies for the delay in getting the results back out:)
73
Graham
G3VZV
A simple question this time!
What is the best coax cable to use in a cubesat? Size, flexibility/min 
radius,
existing space heritage, ease of applying connectors are our main design 
drivers
- we are only using UHF and VHF so losses are not going to be too much of a
problem hopefully..
many thanks in advance
73
Graham
G3VZV 
    
    
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list