[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 pass at 22:06 UTC 2011-10-01

[Jeffrey Koehler]

It amazes me that people to this day still call, "CQ satellite CQ satellite" and having it be so obvious that they cannot hear the downlink.

Unbelievable.

73, Jeff WB2SYK FN13xc


________________________________
From: Michael Schulz <mschulz at creative-chaos.com>
To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 11:29 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 pass at 22:06 UTC 2011-10-01

On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 04:31 +0200, i8cvs wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Omar Alvarez" <xe1aom at yahoo.com>
> To: <AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>
> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 12:25 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-51 pass at 22:06 UTC 2011-10-01
> 
> What a shame this pass, just a few QSOs can be finished because all calling
> others without give a chance the complete the current QSO.
> What we need to fix that?....
> 
> I will wait for a better pass.
> 
> Have a nice weekend.
> 
> Omar
> XE1AO
> DK89df
> 
> Hi Omar, XE1AO
> 
> You only need satellites with linear transponders.
> 
> 73" de
> 
> i8CVS Domenico

If you pair that with good operating practice like giving call signs so 
that they're understandable and checking for available frequency first 
you may have a winner ;).
        
73 Mike K5TRI

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb