[amsat-bb] Re: Geostationary Satellites

[R Oler]

What we need is Arsene or  an Oscar IV in the correct orbit...Robert WB5MZO Life member ARRL AMSAT NARS

> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:40:37 -0500
> From: whiteld at usa.net
> To: ka9qjg at wowway.com; AMSAT-BB at amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Geostationary Satellites
> 
> Short answer: Money. They are much more expensive than the little LEO's,
> CubeSat's, etc.
> 
> 73, 
> 
> Lowell
> K9LDW
> 
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 04:27:53 PM CDT
> From: "ka9qjg" <ka9qjg at wowway.com>
> To: <AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Geostationary Satellites
> 
> > Hello Hope Everyone is doing Well, I know people say no such thing as a
> dumb
> > question So here goes What is the reason We do not have any Type of
> > geostationary Satellites. Is it because they are for World Wide Use and If
> > stationary one could Hit it 24/7 and Maybe park there butt on it and Run a
> > Beam and Amp and take it over 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 73 De Don KA9QJG
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb