[amsat-bb] Re: WA5KBH
Marvin Tamez
k5mlt at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 24 07:58:32 PDT 2012
Great news...
________________________________
From: Jack Wilson <wilsonjr71 at yahoo.com>
To: "amsat-bb at amsat.org" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 6:19 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] WA5KBH
Report from EL29 MD Anderson Hospital
WA5KBH George made it thru surgery. He is short the left kidney, adrenal glands and a lymphoid cluster. He is awake and doing well.
Story is the Doctors and Nurses had to knock him out to get his Arrow and HT out of the OR.
73,
Jack
KF5LOQ
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 23, 2012, at 2:00 PM, amsat-bb-request at amsat.org wrote:
> Send AMSAT-BB mailing list submissions to
> amsat-bb at amsat.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> amsat-bb-request at amsat.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> amsat-bb-owner at amsat.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of AMSAT-BB digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (WILLIAMS MICHAEL)
> 2. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (Ted)
> 3. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (Alan P. Biddle)
> 4. Re: AC0RA/m (Wyatt Dirks)
> 5. Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H (Floyd Rodgers)
> 6. First Call for Papers for 2012 Symposium (Daniel Schultz)
> 7. Nickname of Japanese Satellites (Mineo Wakita)
> 8. Correction (Mineo Wakita)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
> From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org, k7trkradio at charter.net
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
> Message-ID:
> <1335125700.5004.YahooMailClassic at web82705.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Ted,
>
> Stephan gives some great comments on all three radios.
>
> As for the 847 on HF, I think there is a audio clip on the internet comparing the 847 and TenTec Corsair II receivers. I have both of these rigs and the difference is very clear. Listening to my 847 on HF is not a pleasurable experience as the receiver is very noisy. For this reason, my old Corsair II does all HF work at least until I get a new HF rig. Eham reviews on the Corsair attest to its great receiver.
>
> As for satellite operations, the 847 is a tough and a great rig. Mine has been running since the beginnings of AO-40 with no problems. It has some engineering mistakes like the AF gain not being linear along with other quirks but I've gotten my investment back many times over.
>
> If you've got the cash, I would read the QST review on the 9100 and make an executive decision.
>
> GL
>
> Mike (K9QHO)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:10:57 -0700
> From: "Ted" <k7trkradio at charter.net>
> To: "'WILLIAMS MICHAEL'" <k9qho6762 at sbcglobal.net>,
> <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
> Message-ID: <47A336B34C124F9DA426E8D9D2E7AA62 at HamComputer>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Thanks Michael,
>
> The 9100 is not in the cards unless, after the divorce, my lawyer is better
> than my wife's !!!
>
> 73, Ted
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL [mailto:k9qho6762 at sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 1:15 PM
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org; k7trkradio at charter.net
> Subject: Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
>
> Ted,
>
> Stephan gives some great comments on all three radios.
>
> As for the 847 on HF, I think there is a audio clip on the internet
> comparing the 847 and TenTec Corsair II receivers. I have both of these rigs
> and the difference is very clear. Listening to my 847 on HF is not a
> pleasurable experience as the receiver is very noisy. For this reason, my
> old Corsair II does all HF work at least until I get a new HF rig. Eham
> reviews on the Corsair attest to its great receiver.
>
> As for satellite operations, the 847 is a tough and a great rig. Mine has
> been running since the beginnings of AO-40 with no problems. It has some
> engineering mistakes like the AF gain not being linear along with other
> quirks but I've gotten my investment back many times over.
>
> If you've got the cash, I would read the QST review on the 9100 and make an
> executive decision.
>
> GL
>
> Mike (K9QHO)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:18:59 -0500
> From: "Alan P. Biddle" <APBIDDLE at UNITED.NET>
> To: "'WILLIAMS MICHAEL'" <k9qho6762 at sbcglobal.net>,
> <amsat-bb at amsat.org>, <k7trkradio at charter.net>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
> Message-ID: <85EC8F8A1F574F1193BF62CE97B86A0C at WA4SCA>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Mike,
>
> When I bought my FT-847 in 1998, I got the optional mechanical SSB filters.
> I left in the stock filters for a few days, and then switched to the
> optional ones. It made a significant difference, both in reception, and
> when using the speech processor. The stock filters are still in the box in
> the basement.
>
> 73s,
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
>
> PS Just converted completely to the Flex VU-5K, which is truly a whole new
> ballgame.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
> Behalf Of WILLIAMS MICHAEL
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 3:15 PM
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org; k7trkradio at charter.net
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
>
> Ted,
>
> Stephan gives some great comments on all three radios.
>
> As for the 847 on HF, I think there is a audio clip on the internet
> comparing the 847 and TenTec Corsair II receivers. I have both of these rigs
> and the difference is very clear. Listening to my 847 on HF is not a
> pleasurable experience as the receiver is very noisy. For this reason, my
> old Corsair II does all HF work at least until I get a new HF rig. Eham
> reviews on the Corsair attest to its great receiver.
>
> As for satellite operations, the 847 is a tough and a great rig. Mine has
> been running since the beginnings of AO-40 with no problems. It has some
> engineering mistakes like the AF gain not being linear along with other
> quirks but I've gotten my investment back many times over.
>
> If you've got the cash, I would read the QST review on the 9100 and make an
> executive decision.
>
> GL
>
> Mike (K9QHO)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:50:51 -0500
> From: Wyatt Dirks <wyattdirks at msn.com>
> To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AC0RA/m
> Message-ID: <BAY151-W3632E391117BA18917F2D7CD200 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Thanks to all who worked me yesterday while I was on the EN21/22 gridline. I think I worked everyone that had emailed me and wanted the grids plus a few more.
>
> I have uploaded all contacts to LOTW using AC0RA but who know how long it may take to show up. If you don't see it in there soon let me know and I can try agn.
>
> If you want a paper QSL just shoot me an email with qso data and I will send a card your way and no need for sase or return QSL.
>
> 73 Wyatt
> AC0RA
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:19:45 -0500
> From: Floyd Rodgers <kc5qbc at swbell.net>
> Cc: amsat-bb at amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FT 847 vs. IC-910H
> Message-ID: <4F94CA51.6000909 at swbell.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> All I can say is me too. I bought the Collins mechanical filters and the
> difference was astounding on both transmit and receive. Had many
> comments on the change.Best $300 I ever spent.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:50:14 -0400
> From: "Daniel Schultz" <n8fgv at usa.net>
> To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Cc: qex at arrl.org, amsat-fox at alum.wpi.edu
> Subject: [amsat-bb] First Call for Papers for 2012 Symposium
> Message-ID: <528qDwDxo3472S03.1335153014 at web03.cms.usa.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> This is the first call for papers for the 2012 AMSAT Annual Meeting and Space
> Symposium to be held in Orlando, Florida on the weekend of October 26-28,
> 2012. Proposals for papers, symposium presentations and poster presentations
> are invited on any topic of interest to the amateur satellite community. We
> request a tentative title of your presentation as soon as possible, with final
> copy to be submitted by October 1 for inclusion in the printed proceedings.
> Abstracts and papers should be sent to Dan Schultz, N8FGV, at n8fgv at amsat.org
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:51:39 +0900
> From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt at asahi-net.or.jp>
> To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Nickname of Japanese Satellites
> Message-ID: <F7A08DF6C7C44AA18C8855101ECFDA0B at FM4D8C73527130>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
> reply-type=original
>
> Akari --- Light
> Akatsuki --- Dawn
> Akebono --- The beginning
> Fuji --- Mt. Fuji
> Hayabusa --- Falcon
> Hitomi --- Eyes
> Horyu --- Big bird such as Dragon
> Ibuki --- Breath
> Kagayaki --- Brightness
> Kaguya --- Moon Princess
> Kibo --- Hope
> Kiku --- Chrysanthemum
> Kiseki --- Bright tide
> Kodama --- Echo
> Komolebi --- Sunshine filtering through foliage
> Kounotori --- White stork
> Kukai --- Sky and See
> Maido --- Always thank you
> Negai --- Wish
> Raiko --- Drum of the thunder
> Rising --- God of the thunder
> Shizuku --- Drop of the water
> Suzaku --- God of the south
> Tsubame --- Swallow
>
> JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:43:49 +0900
> From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt at asahi-net.or.jp>
> To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Correction
> Message-ID: <59C0D3E3C86244489CEB9783E5EECF42 at FM4D8C73527130>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp";
> reply-type=original
>
> Kukai --- Sky and Sea
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via amsat-bb at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 128
> ****************************************
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list