[amsat-bb] Re: What Happened to the PacSats?
G0MRF at aol.com
G0MRF at aol.com
Wed Jan 4 14:35:10 PST 2012
Hi Clayton / Alan
Since the original launch of the store and forward satellites - Was it the
mid 1980s? -we've had all sorts of terrestrial methods of doing the same
thing. E-mail, texting, social media etc. All have depleted interest.
Arissat has (sorry...had...sob..) some very innovative technologies and the
digital voice announcements were particularly effective. Personally, in
an era of limited communication range from LEOs, I would really like to see
some experimental stored and forwarded voice messages. For example, Imagine
a 'transponder' that would allow 30 seconds of voice recording over the
mid-west USA combined with a command to allow the satellite to transmit that
message in 20 minutes time when it's over Europe. Sounds difficult, but a
CTCSS tone or DTMF could be used to tell the satellite what delay was
required before retransmission. I'm not sure the ARRL would like the idea issuing
worked all continents awards for a QSO that takes 3 hours to complete, but
it would be fun.
73
David G0MRF
In a message dated 04/01/2012 21:08:55 GMT Standard Time,
kayakfishtx at gmail.com writes:
I've been wondering if the issue is not lack of interest but lack of
education and marketing. If newer hams were to see and understand the
benefits of a store-and-forward PacSat, I believe you'd see a level of
support as strong as days passed. I have been playing with
terrestrial packet and digital modes for 20 years and the thought of
exchanging messages via satellite excites me. Unfortunately I did not
partake in the PacSats' capabilities when they were functional.
73
Clayton
W5PFG
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Alan P. Biddle <APBIDDLE at united.net> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Like you, I really enjoyed the old digital birds. However, the interest
in
> that has fallen off. AO-51 did have a very nice system, and a few other
> satellites have had more traditional Packet BBS capabilities. The
interest
> just does not seem to be there, when the old satellites died, there were
not
> replaced.
>
> 73s,
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
> Behalf Of Chris Maness
> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 9:56 PM
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] What Happened to the PacSats?
>
> About 12 years ago, I was really into amateur radio satellites (the
> analog birds). I always wanted to try the PacSats, but I was a
> college student, and could not afford all of the necessary hardware.
> I tried to do it in software (and ended up falling in love with
> Linux). Now I have a good source of income, and was looking into
> dabbling in the PacSats, but looking at the Amsat website, it looks
> like none of the old birds are up. So are there any plans to restore
> store and forward messaging capability in future ham radio birds? Is
> this currently still possible and I am just missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris Maness
> KQ6UP
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list