[amsat-bb] Re: SO-50 Interference

[John Spasojevich]

the original guy I was speaking of was the station the original poster
mentioned as not listening on the downlink

John - AG9D

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:54 PM, John Becker <w0jab at big-river.net> wrote:

> I was the "original guy" and your not even close or warm.
>
> John
>
> At 04:37 PM 5/30/2012, you wrote:
> >Maybe the other ham the original guy was complaining about was working
> SO50
> >with a dual band/single receive HT himself and was not able to monitor the
> >downlink while he was calling.
> >
> >John -AG9D
> >
> >On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ben Jackson <bbj at innismir.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Ted wrote:
> >>
> >>  Clint, why on earth would you feel compelled to get in the middle of
> >>> another
> >>> ham's business or posting ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Another Ham's business... Talking (Complaining) about satellites... On a
> >> public mailing list... about... satellites... And we can't comment on
> it?
> >>
> >> Wait... What?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA
> >> bbj <at> innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________**_________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/**listinfo/amsat-bb<
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> >Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> >Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>