[amsat-bb] Re: Keplerian Elements for FUNCUBE 1

[Bryce Salmi]

There's something very wrong with the N2YO keps, I would not trust them
until they are updated and do not disagree with the original keps by nearly
and entire Pacific Ocean (at the time of this email)...

http://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=99991

Bryce


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stefan Wagener <wageners at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you very much! I had this nasty birdie on the Defli-Next frequency
> and after reading your post, I killed my Netgear N600 and WOW, the birdie
> on 145.869 is gone :-)
>
> Thank you again!
>
> Stefan
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Jerry,
> >
> > My shack is (sadly) full of 2M "birdies."  Most of them come from my
> > wireless hub...replaced it once, didn't improve.  Need one that is
> "silent"
> > on 2M, but with so many devices, changing anything on the wireless gives
> me
> > a migraine :)
> >
> > The SDR FCDP+ waterfall on 2M is really, really ugly here. Heh.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Mark N8MH
> >
> > At 09:20 PM 11/22/2013 -0600, n0jy wrote:
> > >Well, I will third that.  I had a 2 degree pass and it worked well with
> > those keps.  Not a lot of TLM recovered but I could hear the between
> frame
> > beep for the duration of what SatPC32 said was AOS.
> > >
> > >I've got a few birdies from neighboring ?? and they can wreck the
> FUNcube
> > telemetry very easily unless FUNcube is pretty strong.  It doesn't seem
> to
> > take much birdie carrier to lose a frame.
> > >Anybody else have similar woes?
> > >
> > >Jerry
> > >N0JY
> > >
> > >On 11/22/2013 8:59 PM, Rick Walter wrote:
> > >>Just copied 89 frames of telemetry from FunCube 1. I agree, the 13066B
> > is a
> > >>really good fit.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>FUNCUBE-1
> > >>1 39417U 13066B   13326.90242084  .00004113  00000-0  57014-3 0   107
> > >>2 39417  97.7998  39.4992 0063751 190.6311 169.3388 14.77099805   237
> > >>
> > >>Rick - WB3CSY
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the
> author.
> > >Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > >Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>