[amsat-bb] Re: Digital QRM on FO-29 (DF opportunity!)
Paul Stoetzer
n8hm at arrl.net
Sat Oct 5 07:14:10 PDT 2013
It definitely wasn't PSK31. I'll post the audio of it when I get a
chance tomorrow.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On 10/5/2013 10:09 AM, Stefan Wagener wrote:
> At one point, folks were using PSK31 on FO-29.
>
> Check the waterfall and see how it looks like :-)
>
> Stefan, VE4NSA
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu
> <mailto:bruninga at usna.edu>> wrote:
>
> Wow, a GREAT DF opportunity and exercise. The Doppler info is there
> to determine its location. Just plot the doppler and note the center
> point and draw a line of bearing through it. Combine with others and
> find the source.
>
> heh heh... though, complicated by having to subtract out your own...
> But we should develop these techniques. They are the basis of all of
> the original Search And Rescue satellite systems.
>
> In fact!!! Why not get a few hams in a few areas of the country to
> operate a CW carrier (at low power) at a known frequency in 4 corners
> of the US and let evreyone practice their techniques. This way, we
> learn how to do it on a known signal.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Bob, WB4APR
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net
> <mailto:n8hm at arrl.net>> wrote:
> > During two passes of FO-29 - at around 0120Z last night and
> around 1430Z
> > this morning, I've heard some QRM that sounds like a digital
> signal. I
> > confirmed that others heard it too and it wasn't local QRM, so it's
> > obviously being relayed by the satellite. Downlink is around
> 435.860 MHz (I
> > heard it around 435.865 last night as the satellite was
> approaching and
> > around 435.855 MHz this morning as the satellite was moving
> away), so the
> > signal is likely being transmitted around 145.940 MHz.
> >
> > Has anybody else heard it? Any ideas on what the source might be?
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Paul Stoetzer, N8HM
> > Washington, DC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>.
> Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>. Opinions
> expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list