[amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun KG-UV8D

[Alan]

I ask about that yearly at Dayton.  The answers, when not blank expressions, are along the lines of
"Satellite operators already know this, and are a tiny fraction of our market compared to APRS."
Obviously my suggestion that adding the phrase "Full Duplex Satellite Capable" might increase that
fraction has fallen on deaf ears.

Alan
WA4SCA


<-----Original Message-----
<From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org 
<[mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Paul Stoetzer
<Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 12:15 PM
<To: Mike Murphree
<Cc: Clint Bradford; amsat-bb at amsat.org
<Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun KG-UV8D
<
<No idea why it's not in the literature, but it definitely is 
<full duplex,
<just like the earlier models of the D7 series.
<
<73,
<
<Paul, N8HM
<
<
<On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Mike Murphree <mike at tropo.org> wrote:
<
<>
<>
<> On Saturday, April 12, 2014, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net> wrote:
<>
<>> Just the Kenwood TH-D72A.
<>>
<>> 73,
<>>
<>> Paul, N8HM
<>>
<>>
<>>
<> If the Kenwood is full-duplex, why don't they claim that 
<anywhere in their
<> literature?
<>
<> Mike N4MHO
<>
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of 
<the author.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur 
<satellite program!
<Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<