[amsat-bb] Fox, "Easy Sats"....et al....
Steve Kristoff
skristof at etczone.net
Sat Jul 4 18:45:11 UTC 2015
I have no idea if you're a teacher or not, but generally speaking, if you
want to help someone learn something, you start with the easy stuff, then
help them work their way up.
Also, this is a hobby. Some folks may simply find it fun to work an FM
satellite once in a while and sweat the fancy stuff.
Steve AI9IN
P.S. Two Baofengs won't get you full-duplex because the one you use for the
receiver desensitizes when you transmit with the other one.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jerzycke" <kq6ea at verizon.net>
To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Fox, "Easy Sats"....et al....
> You're missing the point, Steve.
>
> This is supposed to be an *educational* activity, not "Gee Look how *EASY*
> it is".
>
> If you can afford one Baofeng HT, then you can afford TWO so you can run
> full duplex.
>
> The FM satellites are a zoo 90% of the time. People just don't want to
> admit it......
>
> Jim KQ6EA
>
>
> On 07/04/2015 05:15 PM, Steve Kristoff wrote:
>> So, we should make them only available to the Amateur Radio elite who can
>> afford computer tracked rotors with separate yagis and all-mode full
>> duplex U/V radios? Keep out the riff-raff.
>>
>> Steve AI9IN
>> Riff-raff at EM79
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael" <Mat_62 at charter.net>
>> To: <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 1:02 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Fox, "Easy Sats"....et al....
>>
>>
>>> Once again I feel the need to say that we have gone in the wrong
>>> direction by trying to convince everyone how easy a "sat" is to work
>>> with a handheld antenna. I got into satellite communication because of
>>> the technical challenge involved, not by how "easy it was".
>>> This whole half or full duplex issue is a symptom of "dumbing down"
>>> There should never be any question on it. Full duplex should ALWAYS be
>>> used.
>>> 73,
>>> Michael, W4HIJ
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>> Steve Kristoff
>> skristof at etczone.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
Steve Kristoff
skristof at etczone.com
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list