[amsat-bb] SO-50
Rick Tejera
saguaroastro at cox.net
Thu Jul 16 23:31:00 UTC 2015
Regardless of the pass, when it gets yo about 5 degrees, I send the on tone, even if I hear other stations (during a break) this way I know I have at least 10 minutes before it turns off.
Rick Tejera K7TEJSaguaroAstro at cox.net623-203-4121
-------- Original message --------
From: Neil Smith <n5eil at me.com>
Date: 07/16/2015 16:25 (GMT-07:00)
To: Bryan Green <bryan at kl7cn.net>
Cc: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SO-50
So is it good practice on a west to east approach when the bird breaks horizon and nothing is heard for the first 10 or so degrees in the pass to go ahead and attempt to turn it on?
-Neil
> On Jul 16, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Bryan Green <bryan at kl7cn.net> wrote:
>
> I've turned it on plenty of times from a western approach. Usually it takes a good 5 second burst of carrier at 74.4 Hz. The only way to tell is to switch back to 67 Hz and send a carrier. If you hear quieting, it's on.
>
> Bryan KL7CN/W6
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jul 16, 2015, at 14:50, Neil Smith <n5eil at me.com> wrote:
>>
>> Was anyone able to work the 1902 UTC west coast pass? It was coming in from the southeast over the pacific, so I figured it might not be turned on, but I expected to hear some traffic on it by the end of the pass. When it’s off and needs the 74.4hz 2 second tone to reset the timer does so-50 give any feedback to indicate that’s it’s now on?
>>
>> -Neil N5EIL
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2015, at 6:40 AM, Bill Dillon <bill.g.dillon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I had no trouble on the following 05:15-05:30 UT pass.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> --Bill, KG5FQX
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Lee Ernstrom <lee.ernstrom at rcwilley.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On the 0330-0341 pass of SO-50 this evening, Wednesday, I couldn't get it
>>>> to come to life. Was it just me? Did I lose my pre-amp or was there
>>>> something wrong with the sat?
>>>>
>>>> Lee (Doc) Ernstrom
>>>> Syracuse, Utah DN-31
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>>>> expressed
>>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>>> AMSAT-NA.
>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list