[amsat-bb] Any recommendations on a good dual band HT whip??

Alan wa4sca at gmail.com
Sat Aug 20 07:14:49 UTC 2016


Scott,

The Pryme is great, and about the price of an RH-77 at HRO. I have used mine as a pointer when giving an 
AMSAT forum. It allows me to demonstrate that you can work satellites without a big antenna.

 It is a bit large for ordinary use, at least for most people and HTs. A few weeks back, I took my HT to 
the local weekly breakfast group. When I set it on the table and extended the antenna, the conversations 
stopped and everybody stared.

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA



<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Scott Medbury
<Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:57 PM
<To: Ted <k7trkradio at charter.net>
<Cc: amsat-bb at amsat.org
<Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Any recommendations on a good dual band HT whip??
<
<The best one I have ever used for satellite is the telescopic Pryme AL-800. Over 4000 contacts in 16
<years. And numerous FM birds
<
<73 ... Scott KD5FBA
<
<
<
<Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
<On Aug 19, 2016 7:28 PM, Ted <k7trkradio at charter.net> wrote:
<>
<> Ditto?? Diamond SRH77CA...works fine
<>
<> 73, K7TRK
<>
<> -----Original Message-----
<> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Greg D
<> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 3:22 PM
<> To: n4csitwo at bellsouth.net; amsat-bb at amsat.org
<> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Any recommendations on a good dual band HT whip??
<>
<> Just curious, which ones have you looked at?? I've been using the RH-77B
<> (from Diamond, I think) for years, but am blissfully unaware of its
<> characteristics.
<>
<> Greg? KO6TH
<>
<>
<> n4csitwo at bellsouth.net wrote:
<> > I need to find a good 2M/70cm dual band HT whip currently on the market.
<> All the ones I've analyzed appear to be off frequency. Any suggestions are
<> appreciated.
<> >
<> > Dave, AA4KN
<> >
<> >
<> > ---
<> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
<> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
<> > _______________________________________________
<> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
<> > Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
<> official views of AMSAT-NA.
<> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<>
<> _______________________________________________
<> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
<> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
<> views of AMSAT-NA.
<> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<>
<> _______________________________________________
<> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
<> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
<> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb




More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list