[amsat-bb] Fw: HF-HF satellite
R.T.Liddy
k8bl at ameritech.net
Fri May 27 13:14:24 UTC 2016
The RS Birds were fantastic! I worked a lot of Mode A with
a 2M all-mode to a Ringo Ranger and an HF XCVR to a
Tribander. Sat tracking in the early days was with an AMSAT
OSCAR-LOCATOR (Rotating mylar discs over a global map!!).
Once computerized, I used a Radio Shack TRS-80 with a program
I think was called Sat-Tracker(??). Ah, the Good Ol' Days!!
73, Bob K8BL (AMSAT since 1979)
From: Alan <wa4sca at gmail.com>
To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 5:10 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HF-HF satellite
Joe,
Some of the new dongles cover 10 meters, and the price is down below $100 for at least one, the
Airspy.
While not technically a receiver, I have a radio shack HTX-100, still seen at larger hamfests for
$40-75, which would work well. I used it as part of my AO-40 telemetry system. Don't recall I have
ever used it for TX.
73s,
Alan
WA4SCA
<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Joe
<Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 10:32 PM
<To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner at mindspring.com>
<Cc: amsat-bb at amsat.org
<Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HF-HF satellite
<
<example please?
<
<Joe WB9SBD
<Sig
<The Original Rolling Ball Clock
<Idle Tyme
<Idle-Tyme.com
<http://www.idle-tyme.com
<On 5/26/2016 10:26 PM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
<> 10m all modes receivers are cheap.
<>
<> 73, Drew KO4MA
<>
<>> On May 26, 2016, at 11:09 PM, Joe <nss at mwt.net> wrote:
<>>
<>> I would just miss the full duplex possibility mode "A" gives you.
<>>
<>> Joe WB9SBD
<>> Sig
<>> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
<>> Idle Tyme
<>> Idle-Tyme.com
<>> http://www.idle-tyme.com
<>>> On 5/26/2016 9:20 PM, Greg D wrote:
<>>> Got my vote for 15 up and 10 down. RS-12 was my second satellite (RS-10
<>>> was the first).
<>>>
<>>> As noted, the entry to Ham radio is not via HF these days, but with no
<>>> HEO sats, one can stretch the footprint pretty well with an HF bird,
<>>> working it well below the horizon. That might attract more usage of the
<>>> HF bands, and revitalize a lost mode of communication with some really
<>>> bizarre propagation.
<>>>
<>>> Greg KO6TH
<>>>
<>>>
<>>> _______________________________________________
<>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
<>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
<>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<>> _______________________________________________
<>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
<>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
<>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<>
<>
<>
<
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list