[amsat-bb] CY9C Satellite Q's In LoTW?

[Bob]

Hi Paul,

Great job -- I have my LotW QSLs now.  Sat stuff always harder and not
obvious, sadly.

73, Bob, WB4SON


On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Jari A <oh2fqv at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all, in my case, I had qso via FO-29, but qso has logged by CY9C
> operator as 70cm qso. Could that error be of this? Uplink is the band to
> set for a log, yes?
>
> Regards,
>
> :Jari / OH2FQV
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net> wrote:
>
> > All CY9C satellite QSOs were uploaded to LoTW a few days ago, except for
> > the last day of passes worked. Those QSOs have been recovered, formatted
> > for LoTW, and sent to the QSL manager for upload to LoTW.
> >
> > However, for an unknown reason, some of the QSOs are not matching. I have
> > not been able to find any discrepancies that would explain that. If your
> > QSO(s) did not match, please send me a screenshot of the QSO details page
> > from the LoTW website and I will try to figure it out.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Paul, N8HM
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, R.T.Liddy <k8bl at ameritech.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone received a LoTW confirmation for CY9C
> > > on Satellite from their 8/2016 DXpedition?  I see my QSO
> > > in their ClubLog as 2m (it was on AO-7).  The only info I've
> > > heard was that they were having a N1MM Log issue that didn't
> > > upload Sat QSOs correctly.  Over 2 months seems like a long
> > > time to fix something like that.
> > > I'm sure it will be resolved eventually, but I'm holding off with
> > > submissions for VUCC and DXCC because of that ONE LoTW
> > > QSL. If I submit now, that QSL will certainly show up soon
> > > afterward and sit there like an orphan for quite a while until I get
> > > others for the next submission. (Murphy's Law!!)
> > > TNX/73,       Bob  K8BL
> > > (Life's a Beach, and then you die!!)     :o|
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions
> > > expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>