[amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A
Joe
nss at mwt.net
Sat Jun 10 23:32:46 UTC 2017
True! even tho I'm in a good spot here, if there is noise it is because
I'm making it.
Closest neighbor that is here year round is like 1/2 a mile away, rest
are vacation homes even further away.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 6/10/2017 6:30 PM, John Geiger wrote:
> The noise floor was probably a lot less back then, no switching
> wall-warts on every device.
>
> 73 John AF5CC
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Joe <nss at mwt.net
> <mailto:nss at mwt.net>> wrote:
>
> I just played with it some when the Mode "A" was predictable a few
> months ago. And from what I remember in like 1976 it seemed a LOT
> stronger back then. Nothing special a 10 meter dipole and Drake
> TR-4 for the receiver back then.
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 6/10/2017 6:02 PM, rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> It's about an S-unit weaker.
>
> 73 Ray W2RS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe <nss at mwt.net <mailto:nss at mwt.net>>
> Ts o: rsoifer1 <rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>>;
> gzook <gzook at yahoo.com <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com>>; amsat-bb
> <amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
> Sent: Sat, Jun 10, 2017 1:09 pm
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A
>
> How does it compare now to back then signal strength wise?
> Joe WB9SBD
>
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 6/10/2017 3:04 PM, rsoifer1--- via AMSAT-BB wrote:
>
> Hi Glen,
>
>
> I remember working you with that set-up.
>
>
> 73 Ray W2RS
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Zook<gzook at yahoo.com <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com>>
> <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com>>
> To: rsoifer1<rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>>
> <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>>;
> amsat-bb<amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
> <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
> Sent: Sat, Jun 10, 2017 12:41 pm
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A
>
>
>
> In the "goode olde dayes", when AO-7 was new (and also
> Oscar VI), I used to use a 2-element 10-meter beam mounted
> below a 7-element 2-meter Yagi elevated about 45-degrees.
> Later, added a 70 cm beam with the 2-meter beam on an az-el
> mount with a TV rotor for the elevation.
>
> Glen, K9STH
> Amsat 239 / LM 463
> Website:http://k9sth.net
>
>
>
> From: rsoifer1--- via
> AMSAT-BB<amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
> <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
> To:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:To%3Aamsat-bb at amsat.org>
> <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
> Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 2:22 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A
>
>
> Mode A has always been weaker than Mode B, but with a
> decent 10-meter antenna it is quite usable. Many operators
> access Mode B with a 2-meter beam of some sort, then try to
> hear Mode A with a dipole or ground-mounted vertical , then
> complain that they cannot hear it.
>
>
>
>
>
> There is no substitute for a good 10-meter beam. A
> tri-bander usually works too, but check the tuning to see that
> the SWR isn't too high at 29.5 MHz. If it is, you may have to
> re-tune it or even shorten the elements slightly. If you
> absolutely cannot put up a beam, your second choice can be a
> 10-meter ground plane, elevated so it is mounted in the
> clear. It has no forward gain of course, but it will give you
> a low radiation angle, which will help in hearing AO-7 when it
> is at low elevation which it is most of the time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> With Field Day coming up, a little attention now to your
> 10-meter antenna will show up in your results later.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent viaAMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:viaAMSAT-BB at amsat.org>
> <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>>.
> AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
> membership. Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
> official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription
> settings:http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>. AMSAT-NA
> makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings:
> http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
>
>
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list