[amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A

Joe nss at mwt.net
Sat Jun 10 23:32:46 UTC 2017


True! even tho I'm in a good spot here, if there is noise it is because 
I'm making it.
Closest neighbor that is here year round is like 1/2 a mile away, rest 
are vacation homes even further away.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 6/10/2017 6:30 PM, John Geiger wrote:
> The noise floor was probably a lot less back then, no switching 
> wall-warts on every device.
>
> 73 John AF5CC
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Joe <nss at mwt.net 
> <mailto:nss at mwt.net>> wrote:
>
>     I just played with it some when the Mode "A" was predictable a few
>     months ago. And from what I remember in like 1976 it seemed a LOT
>     stronger back then. Nothing special a 10 meter dipole and Drake
>     TR-4 for the receiver back then.
>
>     Joe WB9SBD
>     Sig
>     The Original Rolling Ball Clock
>     Idle Tyme
>     Idle-Tyme.com
>     http://www.idle-tyme.com
>     On 6/10/2017 6:02 PM, rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>
>     wrote:
>
>         It's about an S-unit weaker.
>
>         73 Ray W2RS
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Joe <nss at mwt.net <mailto:nss at mwt.net>>
>         Ts o: rsoifer1 <rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>>;
>         gzook <gzook at yahoo.com <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com>>; amsat-bb
>         <amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
>         Sent: Sat, Jun 10, 2017 1:09 pm
>         Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A
>
>         How does it compare now to back then signal strength wise?
>         Joe WB9SBD
>
>         The Original Rolling Ball Clock
>         Idle Tyme
>         Idle-Tyme.com
>         http://www.idle-tyme.com
>         On 6/10/2017 3:04 PM, rsoifer1--- via AMSAT-BB wrote:
>
>             Hi Glen,
>
>
>             I remember working you with that set-up.
>
>
>             73 Ray W2RS
>
>
>
>             -----Original Message-----
>             From: Glen Zook<gzook at yahoo.com <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com>>
>         <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com <mailto:gzook at yahoo.com>>
>             To: rsoifer1<rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>>
>         <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com <mailto:rsoifer1 at aol.com>>;
>         amsat-bb<amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
>         <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
>             Sent: Sat, Jun 10, 2017 12:41 pm
>             Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A
>
>
>
>             In the "goode olde dayes", when AO-7 was new (and also
>         Oscar VI), I used to use a 2-element 10-meter beam mounted
>         below a 7-element 2-meter Yagi elevated about 45-degrees.
>         Later, added a 70 cm beam with the 2-meter beam on an az-el
>         mount with a TV rotor for the elevation.
>
>                   Glen, K9STH
>             Amsat 239 / LM 463
>             Website:http://k9sth.net
>
>
>
>                                         From: rsoifer1--- via
>         AMSAT-BB<amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
>         <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>
>         To:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:To%3Aamsat-bb at amsat.org>
>         <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>>      
>         Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 2:22 PM
>               Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-7 Mode A
>
>
>             Mode A has always been weaker than Mode B, but with a
>         decent 10-meter antenna it is quite usable.  Many operators
>         access Mode B with a 2-meter beam of some sort, then try to
>         hear Mode A with a dipole or ground-mounted vertical , then
>         complain that they cannot hear it.
>
>
>
>
>
>             There is no substitute for a good 10-meter beam.  A
>         tri-bander usually works too, but check the tuning to see that
>         the SWR isn't too high at 29.5 MHz.  If it is, you may have to
>         re-tune it or even shorten the elements slightly.  If you
>         absolutely cannot put up a beam, your second choice can be a
>         10-meter ground plane, elevated so it is mounted in the
>         clear.  It has no forward gain of course, but it will give you
>         a low radiation angle, which will help in hearing AO-7 when it
>         is at low elevation which it is most of the time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>             With Field Day coming up, a little attention now to your
>         10-meter antenna will show up in your results later.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Sent viaAMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:viaAMSAT-BB at amsat.org>
>         <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>>.
>         AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>             to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
>         membership. Opinions expressed
>             are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>         official views of AMSAT-NA.
>             Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
>         satellite program!
>             Subscription
>         settings:http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>         <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>. AMSAT-NA
>     makes this open forum available
>     to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>     Opinions expressed
>     are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>     views of AMSAT-NA.
>     Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>     program!
>     Subscription settings:
>     http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>     <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
>
>



More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list