[amsat-bb] Tracking errors with HRD Sat tracking

[Frank]

That is correct.

Frank, K6FW

On 2/5/18 12:34 PM, Michael Carper, Ph.D. wrote:
> You're on the 787 release then?
>
> Mike, WA9PIE
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Frank <k6fw1 at verizon.net 
> <mailto:k6fw1 at verizon.net>> wrote:
>
>     I run HRD Sat, SatPC32 and MacDoppler on my computer and all the
>     AOS times match.  I am running the latest release from September
>     2017 of HRD Sat.
>
>     Frank
>     K6FW
>
>
>     On 2/5/18 9:16 AM, Michael Carper, Ph.D. via AMSAT-BB wrote:
>
>         As someone said previously, it's probably a math problem that
>         got buggered
>         up somewhere along the way.
>
>         We will get this fixed.
>
>         Mike, WA9PIE
>
>         On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Francis Geraci
>         <fgeraci14 at gmail.com <mailto:fgeraci14 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             I have noticed mention about issues with HRD Sat tracking.
>             No "specific"
>             problems were mentioned  I have used HRD for may years,
>             and know it pretty
>             well.
>             After the last few "updates", an upcoming sat pass in HRD,
>             the pass over my
>             QTH, is about 5 - 10 minutes later.
>             I, also run SatPC32 at the same time, along with pass
>             predictions from
>             other Web sites. All of the predictions agree, except for
>             HRD, reporting
>             the pass later. I have missed many passes using HRD.
>             When I switched to SatPC32, I started hearing passes.
>             My "keps" are current, QTH is correct, time is correct,
>             and all the
>             "personal" information is correct in the HRD Logbook. I am
>             "totally"
>             stumped.
>             Best toAll
>             WB1FXX
>             _______________________________________________
>             Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>.
>             AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>             to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
>             membership. Opinions
>             expressed
>             are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>             official views of
>             AMSAT-NA.
>             Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
>             satellite program!
>             Subscription settings:
>             http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>             <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>.
>         AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>         to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
>         membership. Opinions expressed
>         are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>         official views of AMSAT-NA.
>         Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
>         satellite program!
>         Subscription settings:
>         http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>         <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>. AMSAT-NA
>     makes this open forum available
>     to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>     Opinions expressed
>     are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>     views of AMSAT-NA.
>     Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>     program!
>     Subscription settings:
>     http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>     <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
>
>