[amsat-bb] Standard for AMSAT status board observations of FS-3

[Mark L. Hammond]

Sounds like good logic, Ryan!

Mark N8MH

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:28 PM Ryan Noguchi via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
wrote:

>  I'd agree that the attitude of the satellite affects link margin, given
> the geometry of the antennas in the satellite drawings I've seen.
>
> This FS-3 pass I just tried must have had a lot more PBBS traffic, not
> quite as much as Wed or Thu, but much more than two hours ago, maybe one
> packet every 2 seconds or so. I wasn't iGated, despite sending my beacon
> several times manually. If the downlink is this full of PBBS packets, is
> that clear evidence that the uplink is active, since only a successful
> uplink to the PBBS would trigger the flood of packets?
>
> 73, Ryan AI6DO
>
>
>     On Friday, June 1, 2018, 3:06:13 PM PDT, Mark L. Hammond <
> marklhammond at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Great. Yes less PBBS means better Digi.   I am convinced the attitude of
> FS-3 varies, and it matters.   Elevation alone sometimes isn’t enough!
> Mark N8MH
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
-- 
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]