[amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs

KE6BLR Robert ke6blr.robert at gmail.com
Mon Jul 15 20:30:41 UTC 2019


Just a thought -- one of the benefits of using the actual call sign
(RS0ISS, PSAT, PSAT2) rather than ARISS or APRSAT is for the record.

For example, I am calculating the Az/El of each contact based on the
digipeated (PSAT*) path. When the digipeated path is ARISS or APRSAT there
is no good way to clarify which satellite participated in the packet.

http://www.spacecommunicator.club/igates/

See the Az/El columns for PSAT; I plan to add Az/El for others sometime
soon.

As a consumer of the data, I prefer seeing the individual call sign. As the
user of the radio, I can see how using APRSAT for everything is more
convenient.

73

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:38 AM Ryan Noguchi via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:

>  Yes, that's correct. FalconSat-3 doesn't digipeat using the generic ARISS
> or APRSAT paths.
>
> Agreed, it's a pain to have to keep changing PATH, baud rate, and data
> band between FalconSat-3 and the other packet satellites. At least there
> are only two configurations to have to toggle between. Once you've done it
> a couple dozen times, it becomes second nature.
>
> Yes, PSAT2 (and apparently also AISAT) may need to use Narrow FM mode, but
> the mode can be easily programmed into memory channels. I just set up a
> different set of memory channels for PSAT2 and AISAT to set that mode and
> enable (crude) Doppler correction. I haven't used them yet so don't know if
> 5 kHz steps will cut it.
>
> 73, Ryan AI6DO
>
>     On Wednesday, July 10, 2019, 10:14:18 AM PDT, Fred Hillhouse via
> AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
>
>  Regardless of the other operational requirements of FalconSAT-3, you are
> saying FalconSAT-3 will not digipeat using the generic paths. That means
> the text in the links provided is incorrect. Or is there some other
> qualifier I have missed?
>
> PSAT2 is also a different beast apparently. The text in the link imply
> APRS uplinks are narrowband. From the PSAT2 link:
>
> Uplinks: 145.825 MHz narroband [sic] FM packet and 29.4815 MHz SSB PSK31
> User Station Software Configuration:
> First bullet - Radios must be in Narrowband and track to 1 KHz Doppler on
> the uplink.
>
> The reason for asking is to be able to make as few changes to an HT (D72)
> as possible. And the main use is to achieve a digipeat. When a satellite is
> the only APRS network available it could be a useful way to get information
> out.
>
> Best regards,
> Fred N7FMH
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Ryan
> Noguchi via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:11 PM
> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRS Satellite PATHs
>
>  FalconSat-3 is a different beast: 9600 bps vs. 1200 bps, and crossband at
> different frequencies than the 1200 bps packet satellites. If you want to
> be digipeated by FalconSat-3, you need to use the PFS3-1 PATH.
>
> 73, Ryan AI6DO
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list