[amsat-bb] New Handheld for SO-50
STeve Andre'
steve at wb8wsf.org
Sat Jul 27 23:46:14 UTC 2019
What about the kenwood th-d74?
On Jul 27, 2019, 12:16, at 12:16, Robert Bankston via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
>Ron,
>There are only 6 SO-50 capable HT options that I am aware: (May be
>more, but these are commonly available)
>1) Kenwood TH-D72 (still in production, so new or used markets)2)
>Kenwood TH-D7 (out of production)3) Yaesu FT-530 (out of production)4)
>Icom IC-Z1A (out of production)5) Icom IC-W2A (out of production)6)
>Icom IC-W32 (earlier model with 5-digit SN) (out of production)
>I have personally used the TH-D72, FT-530, and IC-Z1A on SO-50.
>Would recommend TH-D72, if you can budget allows. Otherwise Yaesu
>FT-530. I picked up a FT-530 at a hamfest last year for $25 and had to
>spend another $30 for a new battery.
>73,
>
>Robert Bankston, KE4AL
>Twitter: @KE4ALabamaWebsite: KE4AL.wordpress.com
>
>On Saturday, July 27, 2019, 10:59:17 AM CDT, Ron VE8RT via AMSAT-BB
><amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Kees,
>
> I'm looking for a single HT to send to VY0Yl to get her on the FM
>satellites (single radio, basic antenna system, simple [smart phone
>app?
>] tracking software) before her summer is over. What did you decide on
>for a radio, and / or do you have any recommendations?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron VE8RT DP22
>
>On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:06:31 -0500
>Kees van Oosbree via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been working the birds for a while now, and I have been using
>only 2
>> Boafengs. I've realized they desense VERY easily on SO-50 and even
>AO-91
>> and 92. I have a band pass filter for the FOX sats, so I can hear my
>> downlink. However, I still haven't figured out a way to get full
>duplex on
>> SO-50. Are there any dual-band handhelds that can receive SO-50?
>>
>> 73 de KE0STO
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>program!
>> Subscription settings:
>https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>--
>Ron VE8RT <ve8rt at yknwt.ca>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>Opinions expressed
>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>of AMSAT-NA.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>program!
>Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>Opinions expressed
>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>of AMSAT-NA.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>program!
>Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list