[amsat-bb] SATpc32 -- doppler.sqf Editor

[John Brier]

I would prefer them to stay as it is a good reference for historical
reasons.

Maybe put dead ones all at the bottom of the file or under a different
section of the file.

73, John Brier KG4AKV

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 16:24 Jim Walls via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
wrote:

> On 04/13/2020 12:43, Thomas Schaefer via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> > A related question…Is there some reason we need to carry old, no longer
> in-use, satellites in these files? The
> > Doppler.sql file is full of satellites one cannot possibly use anymore.
> Same question about the lists in general. Can one filter the lists so
> adding AO-51 for example to tracking is never even an option —as in one
> never even sees it.
> >
> Well, for one thing, dead satellites sometimes come back from the dead.
> AO-7 comes to mind - and yes, I was on the first US pass after it was
> confirmed to be alive after 21 years of silence.
>
> --
> 73
> -------------------------------------
> Jim Walls - K6CCC
> jim at k6ccc.org
> Ofc:  818-548-4804
> http://members.dslextreme.com/users/k6ccc/
> AMSAT Member 32537 - WSWSS Member 395
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>