[amsat-bb] Transparency and Double Standards

Michelle Thompson mountain.michelle at gmail.com
Wed Aug 19 17:10:48 UTC 2020


You might have missed the part where all of the information in this
particular CJ request is already publicly available. It's already
transparent.

The submitted form itself is not usually published. That's the only
restriction we are talking about.

This is fundamentally different from refusing to allow Directors access to
corporate records unless they sign NDAs, then showing up without the actual
NDAs, then continuing to deny access to records and communications after
everyone signed a blank form that purported to be a signature form for
these alleged NDAs. Some of which have yet to be produced and you as a
member are not allowed to know about.

Your attack is off base and inaccurate. I'm sorry you feel the way you do.
This work means that things can get dramatically better for the
organization in highly visible and measurable ways.

-Michelle W5NYV



On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:33 AM E.Mike McCardel via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:

> Just an observation. Among all of this talk, during the past BOoD election
> cycle, about Transparency, I find it amazing that the excuse of the Lawyers
> or others don't think it wise to disclose information can even be an
> argument.
>
> Michelle Wrote:
> "Unless, of course, this  Information contained in CJ requests is not
> usually made public. The law firm would not file it unless it was presented
> to the State Department as private and confidential. This advice was
> because virtually all requests are for proprietary programs and products.
> Sticking out in this regard, by doing something they advised strongly
> against, would not work to our
> advantage in any way. I want to win for open source, not die on the wrong
> hill.  as an admission that NDA's are indeed important and not just
> convenient."
>
> Is this not the very essence of Non-Disclosure Agreements? Without the
> transparency which seems to be lacking here this comes across as a simple
> political stunt. Enough already.
>
> I am not voting for any TEAM, I'm putting my trust in individuals whom I
> respect and trust and have no agenda other than serving AMSAT to keep
> amateur radio in space.
>
> EMike, AA8EM
>
>
>
> E. Michael McCardel, AA8EM, former KC8YLD
> Former Senior Editor for AMSAT News Service,
> Past VP Educational Relations for AMSAT-NA
> Former Ohio Section Affiliated Club Coordinator
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list