[amsat-bb] Members Please Read

[Fernando Ramirez]

So, there's a separate funding source for legal services? The point is that
regardless of where it came from, AMSAT paid for it. And it was a wasteful
use of the organization's resources.

KF7R


On Fri, Jul 17, 2020, 3:06 PM Chad KG0MW via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
wrote:

> I like watermelons. The board even has stated that the legal funds DID NOT
> come from memberships dues.
>
>
>
> On 7/17/20, 3:52 PM, "AMSAT-BB on behalf of Clint Bradford via AMSAT-BB" <
> amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org on behalf of AMSAT-BB at amsat.org> wrote:
>
>     Why are you comparing the legal expenditures with membership fees?
>
>     Di you discover that membership fees were used in any manner for those
> expenses?
>
>     If not, then why don’t we compare that amount with, say, Apples or
> Watermelons?
>
>
>
>
>
>     > On Jul 17, 2020, at 12:46 PM, amsat-bb-request at amsat.org wrote:
>     >
>     >>  Now we learn that the expenditure is over 16k. That is 363
> memberships, if this retired engineer's math is correct.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>     to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
>     are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
>     Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
>     Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>