[amsat-bb] High Power and Rudeness
Zach Metzinger
zmetzing at pobox.com
Sun Mar 15 21:48:23 UTC 2020
On 03/15/20 13:48, Jeff Johns via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> The general public seems to want more FM satellites, but organizations don’t seem to be building them and getting them into orbit fast enough to keep up with demand.
The single-channel, repeater-in-the-sky model was always destined for
this sort of abuse (or simple ignorance). I've seen this happen on a
local repeater, with a footprint of less than 50 miles. Why wouldn't it
be expected on something with a footprint 100-1000 times as large?
Hams clamor for FM satellites because it reduces the cost of user
equipment. Beofeng hasn't yet come out with a $30 2m/440 all-mode HT.
Linear satellites would work better for capacity, and better utilize the
amount of bandwidth "lifted" to orbit by a launch vehicle. However,
AMSAT can't alienate the $30 FM users, so it is a delicate balance.
Adding a linear transponder right alongside the FM card might work, but
that incurs additional solar/power requirements which drives up system
complexity, cost, testing, etc.
There are many variables, and it is impossible to optimize for them all.
That's the engineering trade-off that I imagine AMSAT must face.
Here are a few of my thoughts:
Some enterprising soul should design, using common, off-the-shelf ICs, a
simple PCB that is a SSB/CW 2m/440 duplex radio. Make the plans
available freely on the WWW, etc. Get a groundswell behind it, and then
watch the Asian clone makers swoop in and commercialize it (while also
optimizing every last penny spent). Presto, lots of 2m/440 linear
operators. Worked for nanoVNA, mikrocontroller's transistortester, etc.
Should work for our crowd.
Also, donate early, donate often to AMSAT. Building, testing, and
launching satellites isn't cheap, and your donations help put more birds
into space.
"Cheap, fast, good. Pick any two."
--- Zach
N0ZGO
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list