[amsat-bb] High Power and Rudeness

Zach Metzinger zmetzing at pobox.com
Sun Mar 15 21:48:23 UTC 2020


On 03/15/20 13:48, Jeff Johns via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> The general public seems to want more FM satellites, but organizations don’t seem to be building them and getting them into orbit fast enough to keep up with demand.

The single-channel, repeater-in-the-sky model was always destined for 
this sort of abuse (or simple ignorance). I've seen this happen on a 
local repeater, with a footprint of less than 50 miles. Why wouldn't it 
be expected on something with a footprint 100-1000 times as large?

Hams clamor for FM satellites because it reduces the cost of user 
equipment. Beofeng hasn't yet come out with a $30 2m/440 all-mode HT.

Linear satellites would work better for capacity, and better utilize the 
amount of bandwidth "lifted" to orbit by a launch vehicle. However, 
AMSAT can't alienate the $30 FM users, so it is a delicate balance.

Adding a linear transponder right alongside the FM card might work, but 
that incurs additional solar/power requirements which drives up system 
complexity, cost, testing, etc.

There are many variables, and it is impossible to optimize for them all. 
That's the engineering trade-off that I imagine AMSAT must face.

Here are a few of my thoughts:

Some enterprising soul should design, using common, off-the-shelf ICs, a 
simple PCB that is a SSB/CW 2m/440 duplex radio. Make the plans 
available freely on the WWW, etc. Get a groundswell behind it, and then 
watch the Asian clone makers swoop in and commercialize it (while also 
optimizing every last penny spent). Presto, lots of 2m/440 linear 
operators. Worked for nanoVNA, mikrocontroller's transistortester, etc. 
Should work for our crowd.

Also, donate early, donate often to AMSAT. Building, testing, and 
launching satellites isn't cheap, and your donations help put more birds 
into space.

"Cheap, fast, good. Pick any two."

--- Zach
N0ZGO


More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list