[amsat-bb] IC-910H no audio on SO-50 downlink
John Brier
johnbrier at gmail.com
Fri Mar 27 18:15:39 UTC 2020
In case you haven't already tried it, try your lowest power setting too.
73, John Brier KG4AKV
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, 14:00 af5cc2 via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
> Did you accidentally turn on the CTCSS decode? I dont know if SO50 passes
> the tone to its transmit signal or not.73 John W5TD Sent via the Samsung
> Galaxy A10e, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> -------- Original message --------From: ke4kol via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb at amsat.org> Date: 3/27/20 12:44 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Roy Dean <
> royldean at gmail.com>, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net> Cc: AMSAT BB <
> amsat-bb at amsat.org> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] IC-910H no audio on SO-50
> downlink Paul, Roy,Thanks the replies. In the past I have always heard
> myself. So there must be something gone wrong with my system. I will have
> to check out everything.Thanks again for the suggestions.73s, Jim,
> Ke4kol On Friday, March 27, 2020, 01:04:41 PM EDT, Paul Stoetzer via
> AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote: The 910 is generally very
> effective at filtering out harmonics fromthe transmitter. However,
> harmonics can be generated beyond thetransmitter by poor connections, bad
> feedlines, or a damaged antenna.Check your entire antenna system to make
> sure there are not anyproblems.73,Paul, N8HMOn Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:59
> PM Roy Dean via AMSAT-BB<amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:>> >> > All,Has anyone
> else had the problem of not hearing your own downlink when> > working
> SO-50? In the past I was able to hear myself, but lately I cannot> > not.
> I don't know if I change some setting or that the Icom is going bad.> >
> Thanks for any help. I appreciate it in advance.> > Jim, Ke4kol>>> Jim,>>
> With SO-50, especially, this is very common. The 2m uplink has a harmonic>
> very close to the downlink, which if not filtered out, can wipe out your>
> local downlink whenever you are transmitting. I'm not familiar with the>
> 910 enough to know how well it does at this, though.>> You were getting in
> fine this morning, though (not sure if you copied my> QSL)!>> --Roy> K3RLD>
> _______________________________________________> Sent via
> AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available> to all
> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views of AMSAT-NA.> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!> Subscription settings:
> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb_______________________________________________Sent
> via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum availableto all
> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressedare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views of AMSAT-NA.Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!Subscription settings:
> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org.
> AMSAT-NA makes this open forum availableto all interested persons worldwide
> without requiring membership. Opinions expressedare solely those of the
> author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.Not an AMSAT-NA
> member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!Subscription
> settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list