[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 in V/US repeater until November 1
Alan VE4YZ
ve4yz at mts.net
Mon Oct 26 17:04:19 PDT 2009
8 turn helix on K5GNA D/C, with 40' run of 9913 to FT736 ( my 2.4 and 1.2
GHz setup ) gave same audio performance at the 435.300 on the FT847 with
preamp - excellent signal on both, full quite most of the time when
receiving.
http://picasaweb.google.com/ve4yz.alan/VE4YZ#5202556475297897490 this is
last years photo using RG6 which has been replaced.
Ran them side by side on the 22:20 pass... Too busy relearning to do manual
Doppler on the 2.4GHz link to note S readings. Got Clare VE4NPC okay but
missed completing full QSO with a couple of others do to lack of a 3rd hand.
It is 00:02 and I hear it coming up again. Will watch S readings this time.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org
> [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Clare Fowler
> Sent: October 26, 2009 5:47 PM
> To: Andrew Glasbrenner; Amsat-BB
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-51 in V/US repeater until November 1
>
>
> On for 20:45 and 22:25 utc passes. Early one was max
> elevation of 15 degrees next one nearly overhead pass.
> Receiving with 52 turn helix with cup reflector No signal
> background noise is S1. Max sig on 15 degree el pass was S6
> and on near overhead was S9 + 10db. Had 2 QSOs on low pass
> and 4 on high pass.
> S band transmitter sounds good.
> 2 meter uplink power is as low as it will go on FT-847 (2
> watts) into 2 X 6 el linear Quagis.
>
> Tnx Drew.
>
> Clare
> VE3NPC
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner at mindspring.com>
> To: "Amsat-BB" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 7:34 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-51 in V/US repeater until November 1
>
>
> > FM Repeater, V/US
> > Uplink: 145.920 MHz FM
> > Downlink: 435.300 and 2401.200 MHz FM
> >
> > Reports on the S band transmitter would be appreciated.
> >
> > 73, Drew KO4MA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those
> of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of
> the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list