[amsat-bb] Re: STA License Extension

[Michael Hatzakis]

Does anyone have the text of the proposed legislation so we can refer to it
more specifically in our written comments?

Michael  k3mh

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Bill Ress
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:07 PM
To: amsat-bb at amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] STA License Extension

Thanks for the email link George. My email "objection" email has just been
sent. BTW, who is elb?

Regards...Bill - N6GHz

On 10/4/2012 11:00 AM, George Henry wrote:
> Concerned amateurs should email elb at fcc.gov with your objections to 
> the issuance of an experimental license in the amateur service for a 
> commercial satellite which would appear to violate 97.3(a)(4), and 
> requesting that the Commission deny the STA to extend said license.
>
> I just did...
>
>
> George, KA3HSW
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Andrew Glasbrenner<glasbrenner at mindspring.com>
>> To: nigel A. Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF<nigel at ngunn.net>; amsat-bb at amsat.org
>> Sent: Thu, October 4, 2012 9:44:47 AM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 329
>>
>>
>> There is a pending STA request to extend the original experimental
license.
>>
>> 73, Drew KO4MA
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "nigel A. Gunn  G8IFF/W8IFF"<nigel at ngunn.net>
>>> Sent: Oct 4, 2012 8:33 AM
>>> To: amsat-bb at amsat.org, amsat-bb-request at amsat.org
>>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 7, Issue 329
>>>
>>> The stated callsign,  WF9XKA,  was a 6 month experimental, now expired.
>> (2012/02/27-2012/08/27)
>>> It no longer appears to exist in the FCC database.
>>>
>>>
>>> On October 4, 2012 at 6:15 AM amsat-bb-request at amsat.org wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am I reading this right? A commercial s/c operating on 145.825???? 
>>>> This is
>> the camels nose under the tent, using our
>>>> own packet network for automated telemetry?
>>>>
>>>> I can understand the uni cubesats on UHF, butthis is OUR primary
allocation.
>> We really need to protest this vehemently
>>>> if they were approved.
>>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>

--
Regards...Bill Ress
High Sierra Microwave
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb