[amsat-bb] BY70-1
Nico Janssen
hamsat at xs4all.nl
Fri Dec 30 19:45:21 UTC 2016
As long as we don't have stable TLEs it is not possible to perform
an analysis to determine the expected lifetime. But my initial
guestimate would be somewhere between 2 and 6 months.
73, Nico
On 30-12-16 19:43, Greg D wrote:
> 18:20 pass not as strong as prior passes. Only got a few moments of
> full-quieting audio. Contacts with W5ACM and KC7M. As before, the
> second half of the pass was much better (nothing heard at all until just
> before indicated TCA), so perhaps the bird is late compared to the
> Keps. Worked it almost into the ground before LOS. I'm using
> 2016-083C, updated from Celestrak right before the pass. Playing with
> polarization seemed to help, but I'm assuming the bird's antennas are
> linear, right? Possibly my relays are getting dirty.
>
> One question, for scale... We know that the satellite will not last
> "long", given it's crippled orbit. How long? Days? Weeks? Months?
>
> Greg KO6TH
>
>
> Nico Janssen wrote:
>> If you are still using yesterday's TLE set, then you will indeed find
>> that BY70-1 is now about half a minute earlier. The problem is that
>> the TLEs for this satellite are not stable yet in the first days after
>> the
>> launch. The right value for e.g. the decay rate has not yet been
>> established. So for the time being you need to make sure you use the
>> most recent TLE set that is available.
>>
>> By the way, the two SuperView satellites are now using their own
>> propulsion system to increase their altitude, preventing an early decay.
>> As BY70-1 does not have any propulsion, it is stuck in its low orbit.
>>
>> 73,
>> Nico PA0DLO
>>
>>
>> On 30-12-16 13:42, PY5LF wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> We had a low pass over here minutes ago and i felt the keps BY70-1 are
>>> wrong .
>>> I start to hear 25 seconds before . Does anyone feels the same ?
>>> 73
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>> of AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>> of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
More information about the AMSAT-BB
mailing list