[amsat-bb] BY70-1

Mark Johns mjohns166 at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 31 02:03:39 UTC 2016


Thanks, Steve. Good to know it's not just me. Let me know if you figure it out. I will do likewise.

 
-- 

Mark D. Johns, KØMDJ 
Decorah, Iowa USA  EN43
-----------------------------------------------
"Heaven goes by favor; if it went by merit, 
   you would stay out and your dog would go in." 
     ---Mark Twain


----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen E. Belter <seb at wintek.com>
To: Mark Johns <mjohns at luther.edu>; AMSAT-BB <AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] BY70-1

Mark,

I also get the “E/A-Fehler 105.” error message when I add BY70-1 to a
satellite group in SatPC32.  Other people don’t have the problem.

The error message (in German) means I/O Error 105 in the Delphi
programming environment, which I believe is an error writing to a file.

What I can’t yet answer is how to fix the problem.  We may have a file
permissions problem.

Anybody have a solution or know where to look?

73, Steve N9IP

--
Steve Belter, seb at wintek.com


On 12/30/16, 1:20 PM, "AMSAT-BB on behalf of Mark Johns via AMSAT-BB"
<amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org on behalf of amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:

>When I put keps for BY70-1 into SatPC32 (either yesterday's keps or
>today's), it pops up a box that says, "E/A - Fehler 105." SatPC32 freezes
>up.
>
>Does anyone know what this error code means? Anyone else getting it?
>
>-- 
>
>Mark D. Johns, KØMDJ Decorah, Iowa USA  EN43
>-----------------------------------------------
>"Heaven goes by favor; if it went by merit,
>   you would stay out and your dog would go in."
>     ---Mark Twain
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Greg D <ko6th.greg at gmail.com>
>To: AMSAT-BB <AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>
>Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 12:43 PM
>Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] BY70-1
>
>18:20 pass not as strong as prior passes.  Only got a few moments of
>full-quieting audio.  Contacts with W5ACM and KC7M.  As before, the
>second half of the pass was much better (nothing heard at all until just
>before indicated TCA), so perhaps the bird is late compared to the
>Keps.  Worked it almost into the ground before LOS.  I'm using
>2016-083C, updated from Celestrak right before the pass.  Playing with
>polarization seemed to help, but I'm assuming the bird's antennas are
>linear, right?  Possibly my relays are getting dirty.
>
>One question, for scale...  We know that the satellite will not last
>"long", given it's crippled orbit.  How long?  Days?  Weeks?  Months?
>
>Greg  KO6TH
>
>
>Nico Janssen wrote:
>>
>> If you are still using yesterday's TLE set, then you will indeed find
>> that BY70-1 is now about half a minute earlier. The problem is that
>> the TLEs for this satellite are not stable yet in the first days after
>> the
>> launch. The right value for e.g. the decay rate has not yet been
>> established. So for the time being you need to make sure you use the
>> most recent TLE set that is available.
>>
>> By the way, the two SuperView satellites are now using their own
>> propulsion system to increase their altitude, preventing an early decay.
>> As BY70-1 does not have any propulsion, it is stuck in its low orbit.
>>
>> 73,
>> Nico PA0DLO
>>
>>
>> On 30-12-16 13:42, PY5LF wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> We had a low pass over here minutes ago and i felt the keps BY70-1 are
>>> wrong .
>>> I start to hear 25 seconds before . Does anyone feels the same ?
>>> 73
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>> of AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>> of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>Opinions expressed
>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>AMSAT-NA.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>Opinions expressed
>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>AMSAT-NA.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


More information about the AMSAT-BB mailing list