[amsat-bb] HF Satellite Transponder

[Tom DF5JL]

Sorry,

But on hf only allocations for satellite ops are existing within 29.300
- 29.510 kHz for IARU Region 2:
http://www.iaru-r2.org/documents/explorer/files/Plan%20de%20bandas%20%7C%20Band-plan/R2%20Band%20Plan%202013.pdf

Same as in Region 1 and 3:

http://www.iaru-r1.org/index.php/documents/func-download/404/chk,fc90aa26474640bdeafda3efaf42839f/no_html,1/
http://iaru-r3.org/?dl_id=1

Bandplans were modified from time to time ;-)

So please contact your IARU HF Manager for further information.

73 Tom DF5JL

Am 26.05.2016 um 20:35 schrieb Paul Stoetzer:
> Yes, the Amateur Satellite Service has allocations in 40m (7.000 - 7.100
> only), 20m (14.000 - 14.250 only), 17m, 15m, 12m, and 10m (entire band for
> the last four).
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Joe <nss at mwt.net> wrote:
>
>> is sat operations even legal on that band? 12M?
>>
>> The old Russian 15 & 10 meters were cool,
>>
>> I'd like to see a good old mode "A" myself. It has to be the easiest (
>> except for the FM Channel repeater on a very tall tower equivalent birds)
>>
>> Extreme simple gear can get you on Mode "A"
>>
>> Ive done it with a dipole on 10 and a coathanger GP on 2 and the 2
>> transmitter was a FM rig with the mic disconnected and a straight key on
>> the PTT. it was a little chirpy but hey worked like 30 states with that
>> simple thing.
>>
>> Joe WB9SBD
>> Sig
>> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
>> Idle Tyme
>> Idle-Tyme.com
>> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>>
>> On 5/26/2016 12:45 PM, Robert Bruninga wrote:
>>
>>> I may have a launch opportunity for an HF=HF transponder for a possible
>>> cubesat idea.  Probably something like 12m up and 10m down?
>>>
>>> Is this worth doing (re-doing) at this point of technology?  Enough
>>> bandwidth to support a few voice channels?
>>>
>>> Any volunteers to build the translator board?
>>>
>>> How is 24 MHz band used?  The entire SSB portion of the band is only 60
>>> kHz, so using say 15 kHz for a linear translator to 10m would be quite a
>>> slice.  But then the downlink at 10m would be OK since it does have an
>>> exclusive satellite band and so any inadvertent QSO's would be coming down
>>> in a non-competing downlink
>>>
>>> Just some open ended thinking after Dayton.
>>>
>>> Bob, WB4aPR
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb