[amsat-bb] 5K0T logged sat times

[Matthew Stevens]

I’ve got a couple of 20m SO-50 QSOs confirmed in LOTW... :-)

So I doubt the band is the issue with the 5K0T qsos.

73,
- Matthew nj4y

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 3, 2017, at 22:54, Frank Westphal <k6fw1 at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> I don't see why not.  I have LOTW matches for AO-7 QSO's where the band is specified as 2M.  Matter of fact my logging program uploads the downlink frequency only for sat QSO's and I have hundreds if not thousands of matches.  When I have cards checked by a field checker they are only looking for a satellite not frequencies.
> 
> 73,
> Frank
> K6FW
> 
>> On 12/3/17 10:32 AM, George Sakai via AMSAT-BB wrote:
>>  ClubLog says my AO-7 QSO with HC8LUT was on 2 meter band also.  It should be 70 cm.  If I get a QSL card from HC8LUT with this wrong band, would ARRL approve it for VUCC award ?
>> 73, George N3GS
>> 
>>     On ‎Sunday‎, ‎December‎ ‎3‎, ‎2017‎ ‎05‎:‎59‎:‎45‎ ‎AM‎ ‎CST, Kevin M via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
>>    5K0T was on San Andreas... My QSO with HC8LUT on Galapagos has the correct time, but it is clear they have the bands wrong. Should be listed as a 70cm contact in Clublog if it's logged correctly.
>> 
>>       From: Robert Bankston <ke4al at yahoo.com>
>>  To: Kevin M <n4ufo at yahoo.com>; Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net>
>> Cc: "amsat-bb at amsat.org" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
>>  Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 9:38 PM
>>  Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 5K0T logged sat times
>>     My 2 QSOs do not match either.  Galapagos, We have a problem!
>> 73,
>> Robert, KE4AL
>> 
>>     On ‎Saturday‎, ‎December‎ ‎2‎, ‎2017‎ ‎05‎:‎18‎:‎37‎ ‎PM‎ ‎CST, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net> wrote:
>>    My 2 QSO (1 from home, 1 from Michigan) times also didn’t match when I
>> checked ClubLog. I have not followed up yet.
>> 
>> 73,
>> 
>> Paul, N8HM
>> 
>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 18:11 Kevin M via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have checked the 5K0T clublog and see that I have 2 QSOs there (wasn't
>>> sure he got my call on the first pass, was at LOS), but when I go to enter
>>> the times to make a QSL request, it says the times are not correct. So I
>>> e-mailed the QSL manager and he sent me back the log entries from Ham Radio
>>> Deluxe. He shows the times exactly two hours ahead of what I have. So I
>>> have checked my tracking programs and I show no passes at the times his
>>> logs show, rather my times show as correct. Has anyone else that made a QSO
>>> with 5K0T tried to enter their times in Clublog to see if they are
>>> correct?? If you were successful, which pass was it? My passes were
>>> 2017-11-22 2029 and 2055z.
>>> 
>>> So I e-mailed him back to tell him I think maybe there is a problem with
>>> either the computer that the log was recorded on or with the HRD program,
>>> etc., and his reply was simply, 'I use UTC times'. I made up some screen
>>> shots of my Orbitron for both his times and my times and sent them to him,
>>> but whether he will get the attachments is yet to be seen. It would just be
>>> good to know (for confidence level) if anyone else encounters the same
>>> problem. (Or am I just royally messed up and not seeing it.)
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance, feel free to reply on or off list. 73, Kevin N4UFO
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------"Control
>>> is the need of the fearful mind. Trust is the need of the courageous heart."
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>>> expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>   
>>   _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>   _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb