[amsat-bb] Best HT for satellite operation?

Fri Mar 10 00:00:31 UTC 2017

My FT-530 most certainly does true full duplex on mode B and mode J. You
must be misinformed on the features of these HT's.

Cheers & 73,
Tucker
W4FS

On Mar 9, 2017 6:55 PM, "Gabriel Zeifman" <gabrielzeifman at gmail.com> wrote:

Even the $30 Baofengs support cross-band memories for sat operations.
That's how I started, but as Paul said, half-duplex on FM should not be
condoned now, especially as our FM birds get more and more crowded and it
becomes just an additional source of QRM.

I've been very happy with my D72A. Packet is a nice feature to have to work
ISS and NO-84.

73,
Gabe
NJ7H

> On Mar 9, 2017, at 5:45 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net> wrote:
>
> You are simply wrong. The Kenwood TH-D72, D7, D7(G) as well as the Yaesu
> FT-470 and FT-530 all are excellent full-duplex HTs with no desense.
>
> It appears you are suggesting that people operate half-duplex. That can
> work somewhat, but is definitely not something I would ever recommend.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 18:25 Dale Kubichek via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Message: 10
>> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:17:14 -0500
>> From: Tucker McGuire <tucker at mcguireland.com>
>> To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner at mindspring.com>
>> Cc: "amsat-bb at amsat.org" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best HT for satellite operation? This is a loaded
>> questions and every HAM I've ever met has opinions...
>> It is better to ask what HT's fit SAT OPs functionality:
>>
>> Everyone wants 'full duplex', I've not seen a dual-band HT that can do
>> 'real' RX while the PTT is pushed, period!
>>
>> Nest shoot for - What dual-band HT can program SAT offsets (in the SAME
>> single memory)?
>> My definition: in one memory can program both 2m-RX AND 70cm-PTT or
>> vice-versa.
>> Why: you only need say 4 or 5 memories per SAT for AOS/LOS OPs - one less
>> hand needed and far less hassle.  I know Yaesu and Wuoxon can do this via
>> PC Program. Kwood TH-F6, Icom IC-91/T8, Alinco G7 cannot they can do it
>> only via flipping the A/B Bands (pain in the butt) - they do not allow
>> cross band offsets in memory.
>>
>> Now another BAD issue with Yeasu & Wuoxun is they both have a high
>> discharge rate of battery when in the OFF state. I found if I leave my
HT's
>> on the shelf for +60days I must isolate the battery for the radio to
>> eliminate wasteful discharging dropp[ing a B-Meter bar. I do this by
using
>> a 'paper' business-card cut it to size, sandwich between the battery and
HT
>> - isolating the battery contacts. Easy, simple, effective, cheap - what
HAM
>> Radio is all about.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dale Kubichek, MS-EET, N6JSX
>> Sidney, OH 45365  EN70vh
>>
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HAM-SATs
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RDF-USA
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 9, 2017, at 5:45 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm at arrl.net> wrote:
>
> You are simply wrong. The Kenwood TH-D72, D7, D7(G) as well as the Yaesu
> FT-470 and FT-530 all are excellent full-duplex HTs with no desense.
>
> It appears you are suggesting that people operate half-duplex. That can
> work somewhat, but is definitely not something I would ever recommend.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 18:25 Dale Kubichek via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Message: 10
>> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:17:14 -0500
>> From: Tucker McGuire <tucker at mcguireland.com>
>> To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner at mindspring.com>
>> Cc: "amsat-bb at amsat.org" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best HT for satellite operation? This is a loaded
>> questions and every HAM I've ever met has opinions...
>> It is better to ask what HT's fit SAT OPs functionality:
>>
>> Everyone wants 'full duplex', I've not seen a dual-band HT that can do
>> 'real' RX while the PTT is pushed, period!
>>
>> Nest shoot for - What dual-band HT can program SAT offsets (in the SAME
>> single memory)?
>> My definition: in one memory can program both 2m-RX AND 70cm-PTT or
>> vice-versa.
>> Why: you only need say 4 or 5 memories per SAT for AOS/LOS OPs - one less
>> hand needed and far less hassle.  I know Yaesu and Wuoxon can do this via
>> PC Program. Kwood TH-F6, Icom IC-91/T8, Alinco G7 cannot they can do it
>> only via flipping the A/B Bands (pain in the butt) - they do not allow
>> cross band offsets in memory.
>>
>> Now another BAD issue with Yeasu & Wuoxun is they both have a high
>> discharge rate of battery when in the OFF state. I found if I leave my
HT's
>> on the shelf for +60days I must isolate the battery for the radio to
>> eliminate wasteful discharging dropp[ing a B-Meter bar. I do this by
using
>> a 'paper' business-card cut it to size, sandwich between the battery and
HT
>> - isolating the battery contacts. Easy, simple, effective, cheap - what
HAM
>> Radio is all about.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dale Kubichek, MS-EET, N6JSX
>> Sidney, OH 45365  EN70vh
>>
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HAM-SATs
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RDF-USA
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb