[amsat-bb] [VHF] [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award

Mon Apr 22 21:48:07 UTC 2019

I have completed WAS on 11 bands.
Dave
N9HF
el99

"Back in my day" doesn't have a place in ham radio any more.

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 5:14 PM John Geiger via VHF <vhf at w6yx.stanford.edu>
wrote:

> Probably W2SZ/1, except for the satellite VUCC.
>
> 73 John AF5CC
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:32 PM Paul Andrews via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
>
> > With regards to 5 Band VUCC.   I think that satellite VUCC (100 QSOs) is
> > just another band.  (more accurate - Sat is a mode)
> >
> > The ARRL identifies 10 VUCC bands between 50 MHz and 10 GHz.  Satellite
> is
> > just the 11th VUCC band.
> >
> > Complete VUCC in any 5 bands and earn the 5BVUCC.  Am I missing
> something?
> >
> > Has anyone completed VUCC in all 11 bands?
> >
> > 73 - Paul - W2HRO
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:58 PM K7XC Tim Marek via AMSAT-BB <
> > amsat-bb at amsat.org> wrote:
> >
> > > A 5 Band VUCC award sound interesting. Would it allow existing VUCC
> > > contacts already in LOTW
> > > to be used for credit or require all New & Separate ones?
> > >
> > > Currently the existing VUCC rules however state that Repeater Like QSOs
> > are
> > > NOT allowed,
> > > and that means NO Satellites!
> > >
> > > I agree with the rules as written and cant support adding Non
> Terrestrial
> > > contacts to a Terrestrial award!
> > >
> > > If we allow this to happen it muddies the waters from that point on,
> > > disrespecting everyone who in the
> > > past worked their butts off to accomplish something not easy to do. The
> > > fact it was hard made the goal
> > > worth chasing. The argument its too hard and discourages others Holds
> No
> > > Water. If you want something
> > > bad enough you will do whats needed to get it.
> > >
> > > I reject your proposal to include Satellite QSOs with Terrestrial QSOs
> > and
> > > encourage others to do as well.
> > >
> > > 73s de Tim - K7XC - DM09jh... sk
> > >
> > > Adapt, Overcome, Succeed!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:32 PM Les Rayburn <les at highnoonfilm.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > My proposal would allow “Satellite VUCC” to count towards 5BVUCC. The
> > > idea
> > > > is to allow the ARRL to create the new award with minimal programming
> > > > changes needed to LoTW and minimal cost to implement.
> > > >
> > > > So far, this suggestion has netted over 40 replies to me in less than
> > 12
> > > > hours. Response has been very positive. I would urge anyone who
> > supports
> > > > this effort to contact their ARRL Section Managers and let them know
> > > about
> > > > the idea—and that you’d like to see it implemented.
> > > >
> > > > In the Southeast Section, we’re lucky to have Greg Sarratt, W4OZK as
> > our
> > > > representative. Greg is active on VHF/UHF weak signal already. Need
> to
> > > get
> > > > him on the satellites more though!
> > > >
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 73,
> > > >
> > > > Les Rayburn, N1LF
> > > > Maylene, AL
> > > > EM63nf
> > > > AMSAT #38965, ARRL Life Member, CVHS Life Member, SVHF Member
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Apr 22, 2019, at 8:11 AM, John Brier <johnbrier at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Would this proposed 5 band VUCC allow satellite and direct
> contacts?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:01 AM David Kerl via AMSAT-BB
> > > > > <amsat-bb at amsat.org <mailto:amsat-bb at amsat.org>> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hello Les,
> > > > >> That should generate some incentive for more V/U/uwave activity. I
> > > would
> > > > >> certainly work towards that end.
> > > > >> Dave
> > > > >> N9HF
> > > > >> el99
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "Back in my day" doesn't have a place in ham radio any more.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:50 PM Les Rayburn via VHF <
> > > > vhf at w6yx.stanford.edu <mailto:vhf at w6yx.stanford.edu>>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Lady & Gentlemen,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Not certain if my earlier message was received. No reply from
> > anyone
> > > on
> > > > >>> the distribution list. Here it is again, in case the first one
> was
> > > > lost in
> > > > >>> cyberspace.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> In an effort to stimulate activity on VHF/UHF bands beyond 70 CM,
> > I’d
> > > > like
> > > > >>> to suggest the creation of a Five Band VUCC (5B VUCC) award that
> > > would
> > > > >>> closely mirror the 5 Band DXCC Award.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Successful applicants would need to achieve VUCC status on five
> or
> > > > more of
> > > > >>> the VHF/UHF bands to be eligible for the larger award. A special
> > > > >>> certificate and pin could be created to honor recipients.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> My feeling is that this award would encourage greater activity on
> > the
> > > > >>> VHF/UHF bands, especially on bands that have less use like 222,
> > 1296,
> > > > and
> > > > >>> higher microwave bands. This increased activity encourages the
> sale
> > > of
> > > > more
> > > > >>> gear, helps protect our spectrum from commercial interests, and
> > > > advances
> > > > >>> the state of the radio art.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Please let me know if you think this idea has any merit, or what
> I
> > > > could
> > > > >>> do to help support the creation of the new award. As always,
> > grateful
> > > > for
> > > > >>> your service to the hobby.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> 73,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> > > > >>> 121 Mayfair Park
> > > > >>> Maylene, AL 35114
> > > > >>> EM63nf
> > > > >>> AMSAT #38965, ARRL Life Member, CVHS Life Member, SVHF Member
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > >>> VHF mailing list
> > > > >>> VHF at w6yx.stanford.edu <mailto:VHF at w6yx.stanford.edu>
> > > > >>> https://w6yx.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/vhf <
> > > > https://w6yx.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/vhf>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org <mailto:AMSAT-BB at amsat.org>. AMSAT-NA
> > > > makes this open forum available
> > > > >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > > > Opinions expressed
> > > > >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> > views
> > > > of AMSAT-NA.
> > > > >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > > > program!
> > > > >> Subscription settings:
> > > https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > > > <https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > > > VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions
> > > expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> VHF mailing list
> VHF at w6yx.stanford.edu
> https://w6yx.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/vhf
>