[amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question

Sat Jun 22 02:07:37 UTC 2019

Ted,

 Let this 'no code General' help you with satellite info.

   https://www.amsat.org/fm-satellite-frequency-summary/
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/fm-satellite-frequency-summary/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254160994000&usg=AFQjCNG7dWjgtEyOweXCkqAkI9e64cZGfQ>

   https://www.amsat.org/linear-satellite-frequency-summary/
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/linear-satellite-frequency-summary/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254346840000&usg=AFQjCNGewg2AStA8hSG9Uslnv_YsG2iSvQ>

    https://www.amsat.org/two-way-satellites/
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/two-way-satellites/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254361232000&usg=AFQjCNELoQFI1Og3TAUwqD5zFWe9rRxsMA>

You can love the ARRL all you want, it's OK. I personally feel that no info
is better than wrong info. And in full disclaimer, I haven't been an AMSAT
member or ARRL member for some time because I didn't agree with things, but
yet I contribute and try to help those that have operating questions. At
least I'm not on an ARRL BB complaining about them and not a member. Gotta
go now and try keeping that horse stuff in the stalls.

Dave-KB1PVH

Sent from my Galaxy S9

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 9:34 PM Ted Krempa <k7trkradio at charter.net> wrote:

> And yet the AMSAT US web page does NOT have a current list of ALL amateur
> sats (aka, known as 'updating a web page' to us 'no code Generals'), NOR a
> current set of numbers for sats that is updated weekly (aka, known as
> 'updating a web page' to us 'no code Generals').
>
> ARRL has its faults but they are light years ahead of AMSAT US when it
> comes
> to protecting your ability to generate RF on the ham bands, satellite or
> otherwise. I'll give my 40 bucks to ARRL long before I give it to some POB
> in Maryland.
>
> Keep the stuff in your horse stalls there, Dave. Don't peddle it here
>
> 73, K7TRK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Dave Webb
> KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 5:59 PM
> To: AMSAT -BB
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
>
> Because I find it extremely laughable that they are supposed to be the
> Grand Wizard of all Ham Radio and they can't give correct info on
> satellites, but I'm supposed to rely on them to defend my interests in
> radio?
>
>  I understand satellites are a small niche, but come on...if you don't know
> what you are talking about just point people to AMSAT. It was noted a
> couple weeks ago on one of their posts that info was incorrect but
> apparently they didn't feel the need to correct it.
>
>
>
> Dave-KB1PVH
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy S9
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 8:34 PM Ted Krempa <k7trkradio at charter.net> wrote:
>
> > Just curious....instead of irrational bashing of ARRL (which looks after
> > ALL
> > ham radio interests, including minor niche groups like sat operators) ,
> why
> > can't the answer simply be to adjust either the up or down frequency? The
> > 'computer control' has nothing to do with it, no?
> >
> > 73, K7TRK
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces at amsat.org] On Behalf Of Dave
> Webb
> > KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:12 PM
> > To: AMSAT -BB
> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
> >
> > The ARRL can't even get frequencies correct so it's no surprise they are
> > wrong about which frequency to adjust.
> >
> >  If you aren't using computer control to be able to adjust uplink and
> > downlink you adjust the higher of the two frequencies.
> >
> > Dave-KB1PVH
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Galaxy S9
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 3:05 PM AI9IN via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On the official ARRL VHF/UHF info sheet
> > > (
> > >
> >
> >
>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20
> > Rev%20A.pdf
> >
> <
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%2
> 0Rev%20A.pdf
> <http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20Rev%20A.pdf>
> >
> > > )
> > >  they suggest that for satellite QSOs operators should only adjust
> their
> > > receive frequency regardless of whether it is VHF or UHF. I thought
> > > standard procedure was to adjust the higher frequency whether it is
> > > transmit or receive.
> > >
> > > Steve AI9IN
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions
> > > expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>