[amsat-bb] New version of LOTW

[on4cjq at telenet.be]

Hello Wes,

a properly logged sat qso is with correct uplink mode+dwnlink mode, the correct uplink+dwnlink freq(band), propagation mode SAT, time,etc.
when uploading my qso's, every time some qsl's are rejected because people log them wrong. Without the right propagationmode SAT most of them looks like a tropo qso, and that's not the the same. You need to use good logging software.
I've never seen VOICE as a mode of operation btw...  

Best 73's
Jerry
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Aan: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb at amsat.org>
Verzonden: Zondag 13 september 2020 12:38:37
Onderwerp: [amsat-bb] New version of LOTW

Anyone else not pleased with the new version "improving" LOTW, at least as
it involves SAT contacts?  Can we get ARRL to undo some things?  At least
on my computer, you no longer can press the Enter key to go down entry
fields one after another.  It's a much slower process now.  Also, the two
most common modes that we've been using on LOTW, CW and VOICE, are no
longer first in line, where an expanded list of modes is alphabetized.
This also slows down entries.  Worse yet, VOICE is no longer a listed mode
at all.  It's been replaced by SSB, LSB and USB.  I could be wrong, but
isn't this in particular going to make QSO matching more difficult?  Should
SAT ops simply enter SSB, or should it be USB (the output of satellites) or
LSB (our input to them)?  In sum, the whole process is now slower with
multiple opportunities for matching errors and contacts not being
confirmed.  Ugh.

Wes NA1ME
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb